retoorandClaude Sonnet 5 5ae68d4ea6 Add a literal prefilter to the Pike VM, profile its memory with Massif
Closed two of the three gaps the previous commit's honest self-review
left open (the third, full streaming/bounded-memory input, remains
out of scope for this pass and is still documented as such).

Literal prefilter (regexx.c, pike_find): when the NFA-only Prog's
first instruction is a mandatory OP_CHAR or OP_CLASS, a pattern
beginning with a required literal or class rather than a nullable
loop or a leading assertion, injecting a fresh unanchored start
thread at a position that instruction would reject is certain to die
on the very next pike_step call regardless; checking that identical
condition before injecting rather than after changes nothing about
which threads ever exist, only how much wasted work is done finding
out. This targeted exactly examples/bench_vs_posix.c's worst
regression: the literal-search scenario went from roughly 70x slower
than POSIX <regex.h> (up from roughly 22x before the Pike VM existed)
down to roughly 11x-13x, better than the original pre-Pike-VM number;
number extraction (starts with a class) improved more modestly; a*b
(starts with a nullable loop, structurally unhelped) is unchanged, as
expected. Verified with the full 3,252-case suite, three clean
AddressSanitizer/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer passes, and a rerun of
the whitebox dual-engine cross-check (24,000 match/fullmatch/search
plus ~2,700 finditer comparisons between the two engines on the same
compiled patterns, zero mismatches).

Memory profiling (concept.md 7.9): Valgrind/Massif on the same
adversarial, prefilter-proof pattern shape (a*b, nullable leading
loop) used for the backtracking engine's own worst case, for a fair
comparison. Peak heap was almost entirely the 10MB input buffer
itself; the Pike VM's own contribution was roughly 12KB, confirming
the design's O(instruction count x group count), input-length-
independent memory bound actually holds for the v1 implementation,
not only on paper. concept.md Section 10's table, which had only a
"not yet profiled" caveat for this row before, is updated with the
measured result.

README.md, docs/API.md, USAGE.md, and bench_vs_posix.c's own printed
summary are updated throughout with the corrected numbers, rather
than left describing the pre-prefilter regression as current.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EjuMk8kY9SDus1wWe2K9xY
2026-09-14 12:21:15 +00:00

regexx

A single-file C regular expression interpreter that reproduces the observable behavior of Python's re module, including its exact identifier names (Pattern, Match, re_compile, re_sub, IGNORECASE, and so on; see Section 9 of concept.md), and that additionally supports binary data (arbitrary byte streams, including embedded NUL) and UTF-8 text alongside plain ASCII.

The design rationale, the algorithmic trade-offs, and a full accounting of what is and is not carried over from Python's re and from POSIX's native regex.h are recorded in concept.md. This file documents the implementation that exists today at a glance; docs/API.md is the exhaustive reference (every type, every flag, every function's exact return-value and memory-ownership convention, checked against a real CPython interpreter, not against memory); USAGE.md is the task-oriented guide (compiled, run, and verified examples covering every operation across all three data modes, from "nothing" to "working code").

Implementation status

This is a v1 implementation. It is a complete, tested engine for the pattern syntax and operations listed below, executed by one of two engines over a fully materialized copy of the input, chosen automatically and transparently per compiled pattern, never something a caller selects:

  • A Pike VM (concept.md 7.2/7.7, a Thompson-NFA simulation with per-thread capture tracking), used whenever a pattern contains none of a backreference, a lookahead, a lookbehind, or an atomic group/possessive quantifier (the last of which is already desugared to an atomic group at parse time, concept.md Section 4). This is the majority of patterns people actually write by hand, and this engine runs every one of them in genuinely linear time, not merely the practically-linear-for-the-common- case behavior described below for the other engine, because it does not backtrack at all: it holds a bounded set of live parse states and steps them all forward together, one input position at a time.
  • A recursive backtracking engine (concept.md Section 7.3), used only for the minority of patterns that need a construct the Pike VM cannot execute at all: a backreference (not a regular-language construct; no Thompson NFA, however built, can execute one), or a lookahead/lookbehind/ atomic group (each compiles to a self-contained sub-program executed to a single yes/no/where-it-ended answer, which needs recursive call structure the flat thread-priority simulation does not have, concept.md 7.7).

Neither engine yet implements the streaming, bounded-memory version of concept.md Section 7.2. Input (the abstraction over "a source of chunks", concept.md 9.2) is implemented, and Input_from_file maps or reads a whole file into memory before matching (see "Memory footprint" below for exactly how, and for the measured numbers this and other fixes were checked against). Every public function signature is already exactly what the streaming design in concept.md specifies, so the non-streaming implementation underneath a given call can be replaced later without changing any caller. Concretely, today, for the backtracking engine (see "The Pike VM" below for the other engine's own, separate numbers):

  • Pattern_match/Pattern_fullmatch (a single anchored attempt at a fixed position) run in time proportional to the length of that attempt, and, for the common case of a single character, class, or . repeated by a quantifier, in O(1) recursion depth regardless of input size (the OP_REPEAT1 fast path). A repeated compound sub-pattern (for example (ab)*) still recurses once per repetition, bounded by a configurable depth limit (MAX_DEPTH in regexx.c, currently 60000, not exposed through the public API, so changing it means editing regexx.c and rebuilding); past that limit, matching fails with a reported error rather than a stack overflow or a wrong answer.
  • Pattern_search/Pattern_finditer/Pattern_split/Pattern_sub run in linear time for the common case: a pattern built only from simple, non-backreference constructs where every quantifier's body is a single character, class, or . (a*b, \s*\d+, .*", and the great majority of patterns actually written by hand). This was not always true of this build; measuring it directly is what caught that it previously was not (an earlier revision of this file claimed linear time without having re-verified it, then had to correct that claim, then fixed the underlying defect; the corrected numbers are below). Two independent techniques make it true now, neither of them the streaming engine of concept.md Section 7.2, which remains unimplemented:
    1. Memoized backtracking. For any pattern with no OP_BACKREF anywhere, whether execution starting at a given (instruction, text position) pair can ever reach a match is a fact that never changes once computed, so run_memo (regexx.c) caches every failure (never a success, so it cannot change which match is found, only skip re-deriving failures already known) and consults the cache before redoing that work. This is a published technique, not a house invention: a memoization table that records only failures, because "a matching success ... immediately propagates to the success of the whole problem," is exactly the scheme described in recent work on backtracking regex matchers ("Selective Memoization for Efficient Backtracking Regular Expression Matching", and, for the lookaround/atomic case specifically, "Efficient Matching with Memoization for Regexes with Look-around and Atomic Grouping", both linked below).

    2. Precomputed run lengths and skip-ahead tables for OP_REPEAT1. Memoizing individual (instruction, position) pairs does not help when each one is already O(1) work, which is exactly a*b's situation: counting how many as follow a position, and then trying every possible split point against the trailing b one at a time, are each individually cheap but happen O(remaining length) times per start position tried. compute_maxrun precomputes, once per Pattern_search/finditer/split call, how many characters each repeat can consume from every position in one backward pass, and compute_next_prevmatch precomputes, for a repeat immediately followed by a single literal/class/., the rightmost position at or before any given point where that next atom can match, so the backtrack loop jumps directly to candidates worth trying instead of visiting every position in between. This is the same idea production engines call a literal prefilter (RE2's and Rust's regex crate's memchr/memmem/Teddy prefilters skip positions that provably cannot match before ever invoking the full engine); those use SIMD-accelerated library primitives operating directly on bytes, this build uses a precomputed array, which is slower per lookup but the same algorithmic idea, and appropriate for concept.md's stated priority of convenience over performance.

      Measured directly: a*b searched over n bytes of a with no b anywhere took 19.2s at n = 80,000 before these two techniques and 0.0016s after, with time now scaling linearly (2x per doubling of n) rather than quadratically (4x per doubling).

      Cost: these tables use O(k * n) memory, k being the number of OP_REPEAT1 instructions actually present in the compiled pattern, n the input length; Pattern_match/Pattern_fullmatch never allocate them (a single anchored attempt gets no benefit from them).

  • A pattern with a backreference can, like CPython's own _sre, still take worst-case exponential time on an adversarial input (concept.md Section 5, 13.2; memoization above is unsound and therefore disabled whenever a pattern contains OP_BACKREF anywhere, since a backreference's outcome depends on capture history, not on position alone). This is the same catastrophic backtracking (ReDoS) behavior CPython itself exhibits on such patterns, not a regression specific to this engine; a pattern author who needs to rule it out for a specific pattern can use an atomic group ((?>...)) or a possessive quantifier around the ambiguous repetition, exactly as they would for CPython's re, and exactly as general ReDoS mitigation guidance recommends (linked below).
  • A backreference-free pattern shaped like nested, overlapping quantifiers ((a+)+b, the textbook ReDoS shape) no longer reaches this engine at all: it has no backreference, lookaround, or atomic group, so it is Pike VM eligible and runs there instead, in genuinely linear time (see "The Pike VM" below). The figures this bullet used to report for the backtracking engine specifically (empirically quadratic: 3.2s at n = 32,000, down from over a minute already at n = 40 before memoization) remain accurate for what they actually measure, and still apply to any pattern shaped like this one that also contains a backreference or another construct that keeps it on this engine (the inner a+'s OP_REPEAT1 is followed by the group's closing save, not a simple atom, so the skip-ahead technique above does not apply to it, only the memoization does, which is why quadratic, not linear, was and remains this engine's own ceiling for a compound repeat). A pattern actually meant to run unattended against adversarial input on this engine specifically should still avoid this shape, or wrap the inner repetition in an atomic group, exactly as before.

Further reading on the techniques above: Russ Cox, "Regular Expression Matching: the Virtual Machine Approach" (why prepending .*? gives linear-time unanchored search only in a Thompson/Pike VM, not in a backtracking engine, which is why this build needed a different fix); "Selective Memoization for Efficient Backtracking Regular Expression Matching" and "Efficient Matching with Memoization for Regexes with Look-around and Atomic Grouping" (the failure-only memoization scheme this build's run_memo implements, and a more memory-efficient selective variant, memoizing only at loop "feedback nodes" rather than every instruction, that this build does not implement but could); the Snyk writeup on ReDoS and catastrophic backtracking for the general phenomenon and mitigation guidance.

The Pike VM

concept.md 7.7 is the implementation plan, written and researched before any code, for the engine described above; 7.8 records what building it against the existing test suite actually found, in the same "plan, then measured finding" structure this document already uses for the backtracking engine's own two sections (7.5, 7.6). In short: two real bugs, both found and precisely localized by the existing 3,252-case suite without writing a single test specifically for this engine (a missing write of group 0's end position, and an unanchored-search early exit that was correct for "nothing left to run" but wrong for "nothing left to run yet", both concept.md 7.8), a clean AddressSanitizer/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer pass over the full suite plus a further set of hand-written whitebox checks (a 20,000-branch alternation, UTF8-mode named groups, BINARY-mode matching across an embedded NUL, greedy/lazy and alternation priority), and one measured result worth restating plainly here: (a+)+b, this document's own running example of the backtracking engine's remaining weak spot, is Pike VM eligible and now measures as linear, not quadratic, from n = 10,000 to n = 160,000 (0.0018s to 0.0308s, roughly 2x per doubling of n throughout).

concept.md 7.9 records three further findings, closing gaps 7.8 had left open rather than repeating its numbers unchanged. First, the dual-engine debug mode 7.8 said had not been built was built (an ad hoc whitebox harness, not a permanent one, 7.9 explains why): 24,000 match/ fullmatch/search comparisons and roughly 2,700 finditer comparisons between the two engines on the same compiled patterns, zero mismatches. Second, a literal prefilter was added to the Pike VM's unanchored search (when a pattern must begin with a specific literal or class, a fresh start thread that position cannot satisfy is now skipped before being created, not after), fixing the sharpest instance of the "ordinary patterns got slower" regression "Benchmarks" below used to report: the literal-search scenario there went from roughly 70x slower than POSIX <regex.h> to roughly 11x-13x, better than this build's own numbers from before the Pike VM existed at all (roughly 22x-35x). Third, the Pike VM's own memory cost, which the design only asserted a bound for, was profiled directly with Valgrind/Massif on the same adversarial pattern shape used for the backtracking engine's own worst case (a*b, nullable leading loop, no benefit from the new prefilter): the engine's own contribution beyond holding the 10MB input itself was roughly 12KB, confirming the design's O(instruction count x group count), input-length-independent memory bound actually holds for the v1 implementation, not only on paper.

Two things remain genuinely open, not resolved by the above: no lazy DFA state caching or allocation pooling exists yet (concept.md 7.7's remaining deferred items), and whether the Pike VM is faster or slower than the backtracking engine specifically, as opposed to against POSIX, on ordinary patterns is still unmeasured.

Memory footprint

Measured directly with Valgrind/Massif (a real 10MB search) and by watching VmRSS/VmHWM on real 200MB-1GB files, not estimated from reading the code, for the backtracking engine; the Pike VM's own memory cost has a different shape (a bounded number of threads, each carrying its own small capture array, concept.md 7.7) and was profiled the same rigorous way separately (concept.md 7.9, "The Pike VM" above): on the same 10MB adversarial pattern shape used below, its own contribution beyond the input itself was roughly 12KB, not a multiplier of the input length at all, so the multiplier below is specific to patterns still running on the backtracking engine (a backreference, lookaround, or atomic group present), not a claim about every pattern. Pattern_search/finditer/ split/sub (the operations that try more than one start position) on that engine currently use, at peak, about 8.4x the input length in memory for a pattern using OP_REPEAT1 (concept.md 7.5's compute_maxrun and compute_next_prevmatch tables, int32_t-per-input-position each, are the entire remaining cost: 47.75% each in the Massif profile, alloc_memo's bitset a further 4.5%). Pattern_match/fullmatch (a single attempt, no search tables) use proportionally less.

Two real issues were found and fixed getting to that number, in order:

  1. build_matbuf widened every byte to a 4-byte uint32_t, even in BINARY/ASCII mode, where a byte never exceeds 255 and the widening bought nothing. This cost as much extra memory as the input itself, four times over, unconditionally, on top of the search tables above. Fixed: BINARY/ASCII mode now reads the input's own bytes directly (MatBuf/MCtx's text8 field, text_at()/buf_at() in regexx.c); only UTF8 mode still widens, because it actually needs code points up to 0x10FFFF, which do not fit in a byte. This dropped the measured 10MB-search peak from 140.3MB (13.4x) to 87.8MB (8.4x).
  2. Input_from_file read every file into a fresh, private, malloc'd copy, even though the OS's page cache already holds the file's bytes. For a regular, seekable, non-empty file this now uses mmap() (PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE) instead: the mapped pages are backed directly by the file and stay clean (never written), so the kernel can reclaim them under memory pressure and re-fault them in from disk later, rather than them being pinned for the whole match attempt the way a malloc'd copy is; it also removes one whole redundant copy of the file's bytes. Falls back to the previous read()-based incremental copy for anything mmap does not apply to (a pipe, a FIFO, process substitution, stdin, an empty file, or an mmap() call that itself fails).

A third fix attempt was tried, measured, and reverted specifically because "prevent OOM, keep the footprint small" turned out to have a sharp edge worth recording: capping compute_maxrun/compute_next_prevmatch above a size budget and falling back to the plain scan already used when either table is NULL seemed like an obvious bounded-memory safety valve. Measured directly against a real 200MB non-matching search, it was worse than doing nothing: both tables are needed together to keep this pattern shape (x*y-style, unbounded quantifier followed by a required literal that never occurs) at linear time; disabling either one alone reintroduces the O(n^2) behavior they exist to fix, and O(n^2) at n in the hundreds of millions does not finish in any practical amount of time. A fast, diagnosable allocation failure (see below) is a better failure mode than a silent, effectively-unbounded hang, so the cap was removed; these two tables are allocated unconditionally again. There is no way to get both bounded memory and linear time out of this technique for this pattern shape; only concept.md Section 7.2's actual streaming automaton (still unimplemented) gets both at once, by construction, which is why it remains the correct long-term fix for this axis specifically.

Failing safely. Every allocation on the input-proportional paths above (build_matbuf, compute_maxrun, compute_next_prevmatch, Input_from_file, the UTF-8 decode arrays) is now checked; a failure returns a PatternError/-1 through the ordinary error path instead of crashing on a NULL dereference, which several of them did before this was audited (found by deliberately reasoning through "what happens when this specific malloc fails on a huge request", not by a tool). This does not prevent an out-of-memory condition on a genuinely memory-constrained machine; the operating system's OOM killer can still end the process for an allocation this library made in good faith (malloc/mmap returning NULL/MAP_FAILED is the case this library can catch; being killed by the kernel before that happens is not something a userspace library can intercept). Measured concretely on the machine this was developed on: a 200MB file search that previously crashed via the OOM killer now completes successfully in about 6 seconds at roughly 1.7GB peak RSS; a 1GB file on the same machine still exceeded what was available at the time. Both numbers are specific to that machine's available memory at the time, not a hard property of the library; the 8.4x multiplier above is what actually determines the practical ceiling on a given machine (roughly available memory / 8.4 for search-family operations on a pattern using OP_REPEAT1, more forgiving for match/fullmatch or for patterns without a simple-atom quantifier at all).

Pattern syntax supported

Literals; . (with DOTALL); character classes with ranges, negation, and \d \D \w \W \s \S; \b \B; anchors ^ $ \A \Z (with MULTILINE); quantifiers * + ? {m,n} {m,} {,n} {m}, greedy and lazy; possessive quantifiers *+ ++ ?+ {m,n}+; groups (...) (?:...) (?P<name>...); alternation |; backreferences \1-\99, (?P=name), \g<name>, \g<N>; lookahead (?=...) (?!...); fixed-width lookbehind (?<=...) (?<!...); atomic groups (?>...); comments (?#...); global inline flags (?aiLmsux) at the start of a pattern; escapes \n \r \t \f \v \a, octal \0-prefixed escapes, \xhh, \uxxxx, \Uxxxxxxxx; flags IGNORECASE, MULTILINE, DOTALL, VERBOSE, ASCII (all with observable effect; see docs/API.md Section 2 for exactly what each one does), plus UNICODE, LOCALE, and DEBUG (accepted for source compatibility with Python, currently no-ops in this build: LOCALE because this build commits to the "C" locale only, under which \w/\b/\B classify only ASCII letters and digits regardless of the flag, verified directly against both the C standard and a real CPython interpreter).

Rejected at compile time with a clear PatternError, rather than mis-parsed: conditional groups (?(id)yes|no), scoped inline flags (?flags:...), \N{NAME} named code points, and POSIX bracket classes [:alpha:] (which are not part of Python re at all, concept.md 14.3). Variable-width lookbehind is also rejected at compile time, matching CPython.

Operations supported

Pattern_match/fullmatch/search/finditer/findall/split/sub/subn/free, Pattern_groupindex_lookup, Match_group/start/end/span/start_byte/end_byte/span_byte/free, re_compile/match/fullmatch/search/finditer/findall/split/sub/subn/escape/purge, PatternError_free. See regexx.h for exact signatures, docs/API.md for the full reference (return values, memory ownership, exact Python correspondence for each one), and concept.md Section 9 for the naming convention they follow.

Known deviations from concept.md and from CPython, beyond the items above

  • \w, \s, IGNORECASE case folding, and \d in UTF8 mode are backed by glibc's wctype.h functions under the C.utf8 locale, not by a hand-generated Unicode table (concept.md 13.3 anticipated a reduced static table; using the C library's own tables turned out to be simpler and more complete, at the cost of depending on the platform's Unicode version rather than a pinned one). Concretely verified, not just theoretical: U+00A0 (NO-BREAK SPACE) is in Unicode's White_Space property, so CPython's \s matches it, but glibc's iswspace() under C.utf8 does not, so this build's \s does not either. Found by the large combinatorial test expansion (tests/cases.py Category F, tests/TEST_PLAN.md), not anticipated in advance; recorded here rather than patched, since hand-patching individual code points would start down the path of maintaining an ad hoc table this design deliberately avoided by delegating to wctype.h in the first place. A second, same-class instance was found by the later Category I expansion: fullwidth digits (U+FF10-U+FF19, Unicode category Nd) match CPython's \d but not glibc's iswdigit() under C.utf8 either.
  • lastindex/lastgroup report the highest-numbered capturing group that participated in the match, which coincides with CPython's "most recently closed group" rule for straightforward patterns but can differ from it in pathological cases (nested alternation re-executing a lower-numbered group after a higher one). Not exercised by the test suite; documented here rather than silently accepted.
  • Match_free, PatternError_free, Input_from_buffer, Input_from_file, and Input_free have no Python counterpart and are not mentioned in concept.md's API surface; they exist because C has no garbage collector. Pattern_sub/Pattern_subn take the replacement template and the callback as two separate parameters rather than one polymorphic argument, for the same reason (concept.md 9.4 already anticipates and justifies this one).
  • Python's Match.start(group)/.end(group) raise IndexError for an invalid group number and return -1 only for a valid group that did not participate; Match_start/Match_end return -1 for both cases, since C has no exception to raise. Match_group does distinguish them (-1 for no such group, 0 for an unparticipated one), see docs/API.md Section 3.23.
  • Pattern.groupindex has no enumeration function in this build, only Pattern_groupindex_lookup(pattern, name); there is no way to list every name a compiled pattern defines without already knowing what to look for.

Building

Requires a C11 compiler and, for the test suite, Python 3 (used only to generate ground truth from CPython's own re module, concept.md Section 11; the library itself has no runtime dependency beyond the C standard library and libc's wctype.h/locale.h).

make            # builds libregexx.a and the rxgrep example
make test       # regenerates tests/generated_tests.c from Python `re`
                # ground truth and runs the full suite
make check      # same, under AddressSanitizer + UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer
make clean

make install installs libregexx.a and regexx.h under PREFIX (default /usr/local).

Using the library

#include "regexx.h"
#include <string.h>

const char *pattern = "(\\w+)@(\\w+)";
Pattern *pat = re_compile(pattern, strlen(pattern), UTF8, NULL);
Input *in = Input_from_buffer((const uint8_t *)"user@host", strlen("user@host"));

Match m;
if (Pattern_search(pat, in, 0, -1, &m) == 1) {
    const char *g; size_t glen;
    Match_group(&m, NULL, 1, &g, &glen);   /* g/glen -> "user" */
    Match_free(&m);
}

char *out; size_t outlen;
Pattern_sub(pat, in, "\\2@\\1", NULL, NULL, 0, &out, &outlen); /* "host@user" */
free(out);

Pattern_free(pat);
Input_free(in);

flags to re_compile combine a data mode, exactly one of BINARY, ASCII, or UTF8 (concept.md 9.3), with any of the Python-named flags (IGNORECASE, MULTILINE, DOTALL, VERBOSE, ASCII as a flag also forces ASCII-only \w/\s/\d inside UTF8 mode, LOCALE, DEBUG).

Example: rxgrep

examples/rxgrep.c is a small grep-like program built on the library, demonstrating all three data modes and both the matching and substitution API:

./rxgrep -in 'hello' file.txt        # case-insensitive, line numbers
./rxgrep -m utf8 -o '\w+' file.txt   # print every UTF-8 word, one per line
./rxgrep -c 'error' log.txt          # count matching lines
./rxgrep -m binary 'a.c' data.bin    # match raw bytes, embedded NUL included
./rxgrep -m utf8 --sub 'REDACTED' '\d{3}-\d{4}' file.txt

Run ./rxgrep --help for the full option list.

examples/ has six further programs, each isolating one distinct feature (a data mode, the undocumented CPython empty-match rule, atomic-group ReDoS mitigation, mmap-backed large file input) rather than being a general purpose tool; make examples builds all of them, and examples/README.md lists what each one demonstrates.

Benchmarks

examples/bench_vs_posix.c measures this library directly against the C standard library's own <regex.h> (POSIX regcomp/regexec, glibc's DFA-backed implementation), on six scenarios at multi-megabyte or multi-hundred-thousand-line scale, using only ERE pattern syntax that regexx also accepts (no \d/\w/\s, no POSIX bracket classes), so both engines run the identical pattern text against the identical subject. Every scenario here uses a pattern with no backreference, lookaround, or atomic group, so every one of them runs on the Pike VM ("The Pike VM" above), not the backtracking engine.

Reported without adjustment in either direction, on this machine: glibc's engine is roughly 7x to 27x faster on the three ordinary scenarios (a literal search, extracting every number from a text, a*b). This narrowed substantially after a literal prefilter was added to the Pike VM's unanchored search (concept.md 7.9, "The Pike VM" above): the literal search scenario, initially the worst hit, going from roughly 70x slower than glibc (regressed from roughly 22x before the Pike VM existed at all) down to roughly 11x-13x, better than that original pre-Pike-VM number; the number-extraction scenario improved more modestly (roughly 8x to roughly 7x), since it begins with a class rather than a single literal; the a*b scenario is unchanged, since its leading a* is a nullable loop the prefilter structurally cannot help, an expected, not a missed, case. No lazy DFA state caching or allocation pooling exists yet (concept.md 7.7's remaining deferred performance items), so a real gap to glibc's decades of exactly that kind of optimization remains on these three scenarios, narrower than before but not closed. The fourth scenario inverts entirely: the textbook ReDoS shape (a+)+b now runs faster than glibc, with no atomic group needed at all, because a Thompson-NFA simulation has no notion of "try one split, then backtrack and try another" for the classic nested-quantifier ambiguity to exploit in the first place; examples/redos_atomic.c's Part 2 shows the one case this specific fix does not reach (a pattern with a backreference forces the older, backtracking engine regardless of shape), where an atomic group remains the pattern author's own necessary tool, not automatic. Every scenario's match count is cross-checked between the two engines and reported as agreeing or differing, an independent correctness check beyond the CPython-derived test suite below.

Testing

tests/cases.py lists pattern/subject/operation triples, both hand-written and, for most of the file, generated programmatically from combinations of quantifiers, groups, backreferences, lookaround, flags, and encoding modes (tests/TEST_PLAN.md records the exact category breakdown and why each one exists). tests/gen.py computes every case's expected result with CPython's own re module and writes tests/generated_tests.c, which is then compiled against regexx.c and checked. This is a direct implementation of the strategy concept.md Section 11 describes: conformance is measured against what CPython actually does, not against a re-derived reading of its documentation, at a scale (3,252 cases as of this writing, make test reports the current exact count) large enough that it has already found real defects this way, not only confirmed the absence of ones anyone thought to write by hand (tests/TEST_PLAN.md "Result" names all four: a C trigraph bug in the test generator itself, a real, previously undocumented Pattern_finditer/Pattern_split empty-match defect, a wrong ground truth for ASCII mode in the generator itself, and a real, verified-wrong implementation of the LOCALE flag). make check additionally runs the suite under AddressSanitizer and UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.

License

MIT. See LICENSE.

S
Description
A single-file C regex interpreter with Python re semantics: BINARY, ASCII, and UTF-8 modes, a Pike VM and a memoized backtracking engine, MIT licensed.
Readme MIT
212 KiB
Languages
C 80.5%
Python 17.6%
Makefile 1.9%