Review update.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
retoor 2024-12-23 18:29:43 +01:00
parent 25b4047743
commit 783943c369
1 changed files with 3 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
README.md
View File

@ -13,12 +13,10 @@ with f.open("your-file.swift", "r") as f:
``` ```
It's fine to iterate trough your project and review one by one, but preferrably not concurrent. It's fine to iterate trough your project and review one by one, but preferrably not concurrent.
My server supports it, but the LLM only limited I can imagine. It takes 15-30 seconds review per file. My server supports it, but the LLM only limited I can imagine. It takes 15-30 seconds review per file.
You can let your file auto refactor with best practices using client.refactor([source_data]) but it will add my name above it and a MIT license. You can let your file auto refactor with best practices using client.refactor([source_data]) but it will add my name above it and a MIT license and short summary of functionality. Probably not what you want, but try out to see the results.
It will only do some additions and some formatting. Not fuck up your code. It will only do some minor additions and some formatting. I care a lot about self written code and won't AI rewrite it. It's a great way to get a first impression of the code.
Using my software comes with unlimited warranty. I do take full responsibility for any damage the software makes. Let's find out what that's worth. Using my software comes with unlimited warranty. I do take full responsibility for any damage the software makes. Let's find out what that's worth.
## Review summary. ## Review summary.
This README file is only a summary of the detailed reviews in the [Reviews](.reviews/) directory. The summary could be bigger, but I limited it to something you would actually read. Every file is reviewed in detail and contains metadata like grade, size and line count. This README file is only a summary of the detailed reviews in the [Reviews](.reviews/) directory. The summary could be bigger, but I limited it to something you would actually read. Every file is reviewed in detail and contains metadata like grade, size and line count. In general, this source code is high quality, graded like 8 on average and even a few 9's. 9's are quite exceptional. But a few parts of this source also had the record of worst code (graded a 4, not seen that before).