From 783943c36939bab43550f9ba9baa5c6fbe7bcc12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: retoor Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 18:29:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Review update. --- README.md | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index aedf764..e5d2d3c 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -13,12 +13,10 @@ with f.open("your-file.swift", "r") as f: ``` It's fine to iterate trough your project and review one by one, but preferrably not concurrent. My server supports it, but the LLM only limited I can imagine. It takes 15-30 seconds review per file. -You can let your file auto refactor with best practices using client.refactor([source_data]) but it will add my name above it and a MIT license. -It will only do some additions and some formatting. Not fuck up your code. +You can let your file auto refactor with best practices using client.refactor([source_data]) but it will add my name above it and a MIT license and short summary of functionality. Probably not what you want, but try out to see the results. +It will only do some minor additions and some formatting. I care a lot about self written code and won't AI rewrite it. It's a great way to get a first impression of the code. Using my software comes with unlimited warranty. I do take full responsibility for any damage the software makes. Let's find out what that's worth. ## Review summary. -This README file is only a summary of the detailed reviews in the [Reviews](.reviews/) directory. The summary could be bigger, but I limited it to something you would actually read. Every file is reviewed in detail and contains metadata like grade, size and line count. - - +This README file is only a summary of the detailed reviews in the [Reviews](.reviews/) directory. The summary could be bigger, but I limited it to something you would actually read. Every file is reviewed in detail and contains metadata like grade, size and line count. In general, this source code is high quality, graded like 8 on average and even a few 9's. 9's are quite exceptional. But a few parts of this source also had the record of worst code (graded a 4, not seen that before).