Revise low level fiber semantics to play nicer with schedulers.

Now that I'm starting to write a real async scheduler on top of Wren's
basic fiber API, I have a better feel for what it needs. It turns out
run() is not it.

- Remove run() methods.
- Add transfer() which leaves the caller of the invoked fiber alone.
- Add suspend() to return control to the host application.
- Add Timer.schedule() to start a new independently scheduled fiber.
- Change Timer.sleep() so that it only transfers control to explicitly
  scheduled fibers, not any one.
This commit is contained in:
Bob Nystrom
2015-08-30 22:15:37 -07:00
parent 91af02ac81
commit 556af50f83
49 changed files with 469 additions and 350 deletions
+4 -4
View File
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
import "timer" for Timer
Fiber.new {
Timer.schedule {
Timer.sleep(2)
IO.print("a")
}.call()
}
Fiber.new {
Timer.schedule {
Timer.sleep(1)
IO.print("b")
}.call()
}
IO.print("main")
Timer.sleep(3)