Revise low level fiber semantics to play nicer with schedulers.
Now that I'm starting to write a real async scheduler on top of Wren's basic fiber API, I have a better feel for what it needs. It turns out run() is not it. - Remove run() methods. - Add transfer() which leaves the caller of the invoked fiber alone. - Add suspend() to return control to the host application. - Add Timer.schedule() to start a new independently scheduled fiber. - Change Timer.sleep() so that it only transfers control to explicitly scheduled fibers, not any one.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
var fiber = Fiber.new {
|
||||
IO.print("call")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fiber.call() // expect: call
|
||||
fiber.call() // expect runtime error: Cannot call a finished fiber.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user