retoor/wren
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Range operators!

Browse Source 
Added ".." and "..." infix operators. Num implements them to
return Range objects. Those in turn implement the iterator
protocol, so now numeric for loops are easy:

    for (i in 1..10) { ... }

I also cleaned up the Wren benchmarks to use this.

In the process, I discovered the method_call benchmark really
just showed loop peformance, so I unrolled the loops in all of
the languages to stress method calls.
This commit is contained in:
Bob Nystrom
2013-12-25 15:01:45 -08:00
parent 2b65e47747
commit 507e89d3b3
12 changed files with 209 additions and 44 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
benchmark/method_call.rb
+19 -1
View File
@@ -39,12 +39,21 @@ end
def main()
start = Time.now
n = 1000000
n = 100000
val = 1
toggle = Toggle.new(val)
n.times do
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
end
if val then puts "true" else puts "false" end
@@ -52,6 +61,15 @@ def main()
ntoggle = NthToggle.new(val, 3)
n.times do
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
end
if val then puts "true" else puts "false" end