Files
tai/research/prompt-context-scaling/medium-memory-frameworks-showdown.md
T
retoor af080fe68e Strict goal verification, approval hardening, retrieval eval, work limits, sandbox caps (1.38.0)
- Approval: re-prompt unknown answers (max 3), shell-only affirmative
  guidance recovery; destructive actions stay strict
- GoalVerifier subagent with strict JSON verdicts, bounded follow-up
  rounds, nonzero exit plus open turn on unverified one-shots
- Retrieval eval (Hit@K/MRR/nDCG/Context Precision), FTS cascade with
  title weighting, query/read event logging, --eval-retrieval CLI
- Supervisor caps (8 parallel, 64 records) and scheduler hardening
  (4 fires/tick, per-schedule lease, stated misfire policy)
- Sandbox box resource trio: 2g/2.0/256 at create, best-effort
  update for existing boxes, rm -f recovery pointer
- Research archive: 12 subjects, 667 sources, 27 conclusions;
  suites 979 + 16 green
2026-10-18 12:13:24 +02:00

1.1 KiB

Agent memory frameworks showdown: Cognee vs Mem0 vs Zep vs Letta

Metadata

Field Value
Institute Molodetz Institute — Research & Retrieval Division
Subject prompt-context-scaling
Document type Source Citation Card
Tier 2
Source title Agent memory frameworks showdown: Cognee vs Mem0 vs Zep vs Letta
Source URL https://medium.com/data-science-collective/agent-memory-frameworks-showdown-cognee-vs-mem0-vs-zep-vs-letta-0f439b56f282
Source type blog post
Date researched 2026-10-18
Researched by tai (agent), model: Muse Spark, on behalf of retoor
Research method Search aggregator result listing (not independently opened or quoted)
Confidence Not independently verified
Status Active

Why it's here

Surfaced by the memory-layer search; the snippet positions Mem0 as fastest to ship (bolt-on) and Letta as more control with more infrastructure, both production-proven at scale. Adoption-context only; seen only as a snippet.

Changelog

Date Change
2026-10-18 Logged as consulted-but-not-analyzed.