research: CAP model handling, model-as-tool and skill delegation (cap-protocol, +59 sources, 2 conclusions)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
||||
# Claude Code: Escalate hard decisions with the advisor tool
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Institute | Molodetz Institute — Research & Retrieval Division |
|
||||
| Subject | cap-protocol |
|
||||
| Document type | Source Dossier |
|
||||
| Tier | 1 |
|
||||
| Source title | Claude Code: Escalate hard decisions with the advisor tool |
|
||||
| Source URL | https://code.claude.com/docs/en/advisor |
|
||||
| Source publisher / author | Anthropic |
|
||||
| Source type | vendor docs |
|
||||
| Source date (published) | Unknown — not stated |
|
||||
| Date researched | 2026-10-25 |
|
||||
| Researched by | tai (agent), model: Claude Sonnet 5, on behalf of retoor |
|
||||
| Research method | direct page fetch |
|
||||
| Confidence | High |
|
||||
| Status | Active |
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation of the advisor tool: the main model consults a second, typically stronger model at decision points and applies the guidance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key findings
|
||||
|
||||
- Claude decides when to call the advisor (before committing to an approach, when an error recurs, before declaring done); the advisor receives the full conversation including tool calls and results.
|
||||
- It is a server tool, experimental, Anthropic API only; the user picks the advisor model (`/advisor`, `advisorModel`, `--advisor`); an advisor must rank at or above the main model.
|
||||
- Cost: advisor tokens bill at the advisor model's rates on top of the main model's; there is no setting to cap or force advisor calls.
|
||||
- The advisor adds less value on short tasks or when every turn needs the strongest model; for those, switch the main model instead.
|
||||
- Claude does not follow advice blindly: when its own evidence contradicts a claim it surfaces the conflict.
|
||||
- Comparison table: advisor (decision points, model-called), `opusplan` (plan mode), subagents with `model` (whole subtask), `/model` (from the next request).
|
||||
- Subagents inherit the configured advisor and the same pairing check applies to their own model.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pros / strengths
|
||||
|
||||
Shows model-as-tool shipped in a major product, with the failure modes (unavailable, declined) surfaced to the user.
|
||||
|
||||
## Cons / limitations / caveats
|
||||
|
||||
Experimental, vendor-specific, and the pairing table is tied to Claude models. No cap on calls.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relevance to tai
|
||||
|
||||
Concrete model-as-tool precedent and the comparison of four ways to combine models. The lack of a call cap is a gap tai should close with a static ceiling.
|
||||
|
||||
## Changelog
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Change |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| 2026-10-25 | Initial dossier created. |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user