Researched first (Cox's regexp2 article, the submatch/tagged-NFA follow-up crediting Laurikari, and rust-lang/regex's PikeVM source for the exact leftmost-first mid-search Match handling), then planned in concept.md 7.7 before writing any code, per the explicit instruction to plan before implementing. The existing bytecode compiler turned out to already produce valid Thompson-construction NFA bytecode (OP_SPLIT/OP_JMP/OP_SAVE match Cox's instruction set almost exactly), so no new compiler was needed: Prog gained one field (no_repeat1) and compile_repeat one condition, letting the same compile_node produce a second, NFA-only Prog from the same AST for any pattern containing none of OP_BACKREF/OP_LOOKAHEAD/ OP_LOOKBEHIND/OP_ATOMIC (a possessive quantifier already desugars to the last of these at parse time). That second Prog is matched by a new Pike VM (pike_addthread/pike_step/pike_find): a breadth-first thread list simulation with per-thread capture arrays, epsilon closure implemented with an explicit heap stack rather than C recursion so a pattern with many alternations cannot recurse the C stack, every allocation checked and failing through the existing -1 error convention rather than a NULL dereference. do_one, Pattern_finditer, and Pattern_split each gained an impl->has_nfa branch to this engine, sharing one small helper (find_next) for the "unanchored scan from a position" versus "single anchored attempt at a position" distinction finditer/split's empty-match retry needs. Two real bugs, both found and precisely localized by the existing 3,252-case CPython-derived suite without writing a single test specifically for this engine: OP_MATCH not writing group 0's end position (it has no OP_SAVE; run()'s own OP_MATCH handler sets it directly, and this engine's first version missed replicating that), and an unconditional "thread list empty -> stop" early exit that is wrong for unanchored search specifically, since a freshly injected start thread can die immediately in its own epsilon closure (a leading \b failing outright, repeatedly, inside a longer word like "catalog" for \bcat\b) without that meaning every later position would too. Both fixed; full suite passes, three clean AddressSanitizer/ UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer runs, plus hand-written whitebox checks (a 20,000-branch alternation, UTF8 named groups, BINARY matching across an embedded NUL, greedy/lazy and alternation priority). Measured result: (a+)+b, this project's own running example of the backtracking engine's remaining weak spot, is Pike VM eligible and now measures as genuinely linear (0.0018s to 0.0308s, n=10,000 to 160,000), not merely improved. Measured cost: re-running bench_vs_posix.c's three ordinary scenarios (all now Pike VM eligible too) found the gap to POSIX <regex.h> widened, from roughly 2x-25x before this engine existed to roughly 8x-70x now, the direct, expected cost of this engine's performance axis being explicitly deferred (no literal prefilter, no lazy DFA state caching, no allocation pooling) in favor of correctness first, per the instruction this was built under. Both results, and the reasoning behind deferring the second, are recorded in concept.md 7.7/7.8. README.md, docs/API.md, USAGE.md, and examples/redos_atomic.c and bench_vs_posix.c are updated throughout to describe the new two-engine dispatch accurately, including this real trade-off, rather than leaving the previous single-engine description in place; redos_atomic.c specifically now shows both that (a+)+b no longer needs an atomic group at all and a backreference-forced variant where one still does. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EjuMk8kY9SDus1wWe2K9xY
28 KiB
regexx
A single-file C regular expression interpreter that reproduces the observable
behavior of Python's re module, including its exact identifier names
(Pattern, Match, re_compile, re_sub, IGNORECASE, and so on; see
Section 9 of concept.md), and that additionally supports binary data
(arbitrary byte streams, including embedded NUL) and UTF-8 text alongside
plain ASCII.
The design rationale, the algorithmic trade-offs, and a full accounting of
what is and is not carried over from Python's re and from POSIX's native
regex.h are recorded in concept.md. This file documents the
implementation that exists today at a glance; docs/API.md is
the exhaustive reference (every type, every flag, every function's exact
return-value and memory-ownership convention, checked against a real CPython
interpreter, not against memory); USAGE.md is the task-oriented
guide (compiled, run, and verified examples covering every operation across
all three data modes, from "nothing" to "working code").
Implementation status
This is a v1 implementation. It is a complete, tested engine for the pattern syntax and operations listed below, executed by one of two engines over a fully materialized copy of the input, chosen automatically and transparently per compiled pattern, never something a caller selects:
- A Pike VM (
concept.md7.2/7.7, a Thompson-NFA simulation with per-thread capture tracking), used whenever a pattern contains none of a backreference, a lookahead, a lookbehind, or an atomic group/possessive quantifier (the last of which is already desugared to an atomic group at parse time,concept.mdSection 4). This is the majority of patterns people actually write by hand, and this engine runs every one of them in genuinely linear time, not merely the practically-linear-for-the-common- case behavior described below for the other engine, because it does not backtrack at all: it holds a bounded set of live parse states and steps them all forward together, one input position at a time. - A recursive backtracking engine (
concept.mdSection 7.3), used only for the minority of patterns that need a construct the Pike VM cannot execute at all: a backreference (not a regular-language construct; no Thompson NFA, however built, can execute one), or a lookahead/lookbehind/ atomic group (each compiles to a self-contained sub-program executed to a single yes/no/where-it-ended answer, which needs recursive call structure the flat thread-priority simulation does not have,concept.md7.7).
Neither engine yet implements the streaming, bounded-memory version of
concept.md Section 7.2. Input (the abstraction over "a source of
chunks", concept.md 9.2) is implemented, and Input_from_file maps or
reads a whole file into memory before matching (see "Memory footprint"
below for exactly how, and for the measured numbers this and other fixes
were checked against). Every public function signature is already exactly
what the streaming design in concept.md specifies, so the non-streaming
implementation underneath a given call can be replaced later without
changing any caller. Concretely, today, for the backtracking engine (see
"The Pike VM" below for the other engine's own, separate numbers):
Pattern_match/Pattern_fullmatch(a single anchored attempt at a fixed position) run in time proportional to the length of that attempt, and, for the common case of a single character, class, or.repeated by a quantifier, in O(1) recursion depth regardless of input size (theOP_REPEAT1fast path). A repeated compound sub-pattern (for example(ab)*) still recurses once per repetition, bounded by a configurable depth limit (MAX_DEPTHinregexx.c, currently 60000, not exposed through the public API, so changing it means editingregexx.cand rebuilding); past that limit, matching fails with a reported error rather than a stack overflow or a wrong answer.Pattern_search/Pattern_finditer/Pattern_split/Pattern_subrun in linear time for the common case: a pattern built only from simple, non-backreference constructs where every quantifier's body is a single character, class, or.(a*b,\s*\d+,.*", and the great majority of patterns actually written by hand). This was not always true of this build; measuring it directly is what caught that it previously was not (an earlier revision of this file claimed linear time without having re-verified it, then had to correct that claim, then fixed the underlying defect; the corrected numbers are below). Two independent techniques make it true now, neither of them the streaming engine ofconcept.mdSection 7.2, which remains unimplemented:-
Memoized backtracking. For any pattern with no
OP_BACKREFanywhere, whether execution starting at a given (instruction, text position) pair can ever reach a match is a fact that never changes once computed, sorun_memo(regexx.c) caches every failure (never a success, so it cannot change which match is found, only skip re-deriving failures already known) and consults the cache before redoing that work. This is a published technique, not a house invention: a memoization table that records only failures, because "a matching success ... immediately propagates to the success of the whole problem," is exactly the scheme described in recent work on backtracking regex matchers ("Selective Memoization for Efficient Backtracking Regular Expression Matching", and, for the lookaround/atomic case specifically, "Efficient Matching with Memoization for Regexes with Look-around and Atomic Grouping", both linked below). -
Precomputed run lengths and skip-ahead tables for
OP_REPEAT1. Memoizing individual(instruction, position)pairs does not help when each one is alreadyO(1)work, which is exactlya*b's situation: counting how manyas follow a position, and then trying every possible split point against the trailingbone at a time, are each individually cheap but happenO(remaining length)times per start position tried.compute_maxrunprecomputes, once perPattern_search/finditer/splitcall, how many characters each repeat can consume from every position in one backward pass, andcompute_next_prevmatchprecomputes, for a repeat immediately followed by a single literal/class/., the rightmost position at or before any given point where that next atom can match, so the backtrack loop jumps directly to candidates worth trying instead of visiting every position in between. This is the same idea production engines call a literal prefilter (RE2's and Rust'sregexcrate'smemchr/memmem/Teddy prefilters skip positions that provably cannot match before ever invoking the full engine); those use SIMD-accelerated library primitives operating directly on bytes, this build uses a precomputed array, which is slower per lookup but the same algorithmic idea, and appropriate forconcept.md's stated priority of convenience over performance.Measured directly:
a*bsearched over n bytes ofawith nobanywhere took 19.2s at n = 80,000 before these two techniques and 0.0016s after, with time now scaling linearly (2x per doubling of n) rather than quadratically (4x per doubling).Cost: these tables use
O(k * n)memory,kbeing the number ofOP_REPEAT1instructions actually present in the compiled pattern,nthe input length;Pattern_match/Pattern_fullmatchnever allocate them (a single anchored attempt gets no benefit from them).
-
- A pattern with a backreference can, like CPython's own
_sre, still take worst-case exponential time on an adversarial input (concept.mdSection 5, 13.2; memoization above is unsound and therefore disabled whenever a pattern containsOP_BACKREFanywhere, since a backreference's outcome depends on capture history, not on position alone). This is the same catastrophic backtracking (ReDoS) behavior CPython itself exhibits on such patterns, not a regression specific to this engine; a pattern author who needs to rule it out for a specific pattern can use an atomic group ((?>...)) or a possessive quantifier around the ambiguous repetition, exactly as they would for CPython'sre, and exactly as general ReDoS mitigation guidance recommends (linked below). - A backreference-free pattern shaped like nested, overlapping
quantifiers (
(a+)+b, the textbook ReDoS shape) no longer reaches this engine at all: it has no backreference, lookaround, or atomic group, so it is Pike VM eligible and runs there instead, in genuinely linear time (see "The Pike VM" below). The figures this bullet used to report for the backtracking engine specifically (empirically quadratic: 3.2s at n = 32,000, down from over a minute already at n = 40 before memoization) remain accurate for what they actually measure, and still apply to any pattern shaped like this one that also contains a backreference or another construct that keeps it on this engine (the innera+'sOP_REPEAT1is followed by the group's closing save, not a simple atom, so the skip-ahead technique above does not apply to it, only the memoization does, which is why quadratic, not linear, was and remains this engine's own ceiling for a compound repeat). A pattern actually meant to run unattended against adversarial input on this engine specifically should still avoid this shape, or wrap the inner repetition in an atomic group, exactly as before.
Further reading on the techniques above: Russ Cox, "Regular Expression
Matching: the Virtual Machine
Approach" (why prepending
.*? gives linear-time unanchored search only in a Thompson/Pike VM, not in
a backtracking engine, which is why this build needed a different fix);
"Selective Memoization for Efficient Backtracking Regular Expression
Matching" and "Efficient Matching with
Memoization for Regexes with Look-around and Atomic
Grouping" (the failure-only memoization
scheme this build's run_memo implements, and a more memory-efficient
selective variant, memoizing only at loop "feedback nodes" rather than every
instruction, that this build does not implement but could); the Snyk
writeup on ReDoS and catastrophic
backtracking for
the general phenomenon and mitigation guidance.
The Pike VM
concept.md 7.7 is the implementation plan, written and researched before
any code, for the engine described above; 7.8 records what building it
against the existing test suite actually found, in the same "plan, then
measured finding" structure this document already uses for the backtracking
engine's own two sections (7.5, 7.6). In short: two real bugs, both found
and precisely localized by the existing 3,252-case suite without writing a
single test specifically for this engine (a missing write of group 0's end
position, and an unanchored-search early exit that was correct for "nothing
left to run" but wrong for "nothing left to run yet", both concept.md
7.8), a clean AddressSanitizer/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer pass over the full
suite plus a further set of hand-written whitebox checks (a 20,000-branch
alternation, UTF8-mode named groups, BINARY-mode matching across an
embedded NUL, greedy/lazy and alternation priority), and one measured
result worth restating plainly here: (a+)+b, this document's own running
example of the backtracking engine's remaining weak spot, is Pike VM
eligible and now measures as linear, not quadratic, from n = 10,000 to
n = 160,000 (0.0018s to 0.0308s, roughly 2x per doubling of n
throughout). Relative performance between the two engines on ordinary,
non-adversarial patterns is not yet measured (concept.md 7.7/7.8 both say
so plainly); this section will be updated once it is.
Memory footprint
Measured directly with Valgrind/Massif (a real 10MB search) and by watching
VmRSS/VmHWM on real 200MB-1GB files, not estimated from reading the
code, for the backtracking engine; the Pike VM's own memory cost has a
different shape (a bounded number of threads, each carrying its own small
capture array, concept.md 7.7) and has not yet been measured the same
detailed way, only checked at a 20MB scale in passing (a peak of roughly
6x the input length across a combined finditer/split/sub run,
concept.md 7.8), so the multiplier below is specific to patterns still
running on the backtracking engine (a backreference, lookaround, or atomic
group present), not a claim about every pattern. Pattern_search/finditer/
split/sub (the operations that try more than one start position) on
that engine currently use, at peak, about 8.4x the input length in
memory for a pattern using OP_REPEAT1
(concept.md 7.5's compute_maxrun and compute_next_prevmatch tables,
int32_t-per-input-position each, are the entire remaining cost: 47.75%
each in the Massif profile, alloc_memo's bitset a further 4.5%).
Pattern_match/fullmatch (a single attempt, no search tables) use
proportionally less.
Two real issues were found and fixed getting to that number, in order:
build_matbufwidened every byte to a 4-byteuint32_t, even inBINARY/ASCIImode, where a byte never exceeds 255 and the widening bought nothing. This cost as much extra memory as the input itself, four times over, unconditionally, on top of the search tables above. Fixed:BINARY/ASCIImode now reads the input's own bytes directly (MatBuf/MCtx'stext8field,text_at()/buf_at()inregexx.c); onlyUTF8mode still widens, because it actually needs code points up to0x10FFFF, which do not fit in a byte. This dropped the measured 10MB-search peak from 140.3MB (13.4x) to 87.8MB (8.4x).Input_from_fileread every file into a fresh, private,malloc'd copy, even though the OS's page cache already holds the file's bytes. For a regular, seekable, non-empty file this now usesmmap()(PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE) instead: the mapped pages are backed directly by the file and stay clean (never written), so the kernel can reclaim them under memory pressure and re-fault them in from disk later, rather than them being pinned for the whole match attempt the way amalloc'd copy is; it also removes one whole redundant copy of the file's bytes. Falls back to the previousread()-based incremental copy for anythingmmapdoes not apply to (a pipe, a FIFO, process substitution, stdin, an empty file, or anmmap()call that itself fails).
A third fix attempt was tried, measured, and reverted specifically
because "prevent OOM, keep the footprint small" turned out to have a
sharp edge worth recording: capping compute_maxrun/compute_next_prevmatch
above a size budget and falling back to the plain scan already used when
either table is NULL seemed like an obvious bounded-memory safety valve.
Measured directly against a real 200MB non-matching search, it was worse
than doing nothing: both tables are needed together to keep this pattern
shape (x*y-style, unbounded quantifier followed by a required literal
that never occurs) at linear time; disabling either one alone reintroduces
the O(n^2) behavior they exist to fix, and O(n^2) at n in the hundreds
of millions does not finish in any practical amount of time. A fast,
diagnosable allocation failure (see below) is a better failure mode than a
silent, effectively-unbounded hang, so the cap was removed; these two
tables are allocated unconditionally again. There is no way to get both
bounded memory and linear time out of this technique for this pattern
shape; only concept.md Section 7.2's actual streaming automaton (still
unimplemented) gets both at once, by construction, which is why it remains
the correct long-term fix for this axis specifically.
Failing safely. Every allocation on the input-proportional paths above
(build_matbuf, compute_maxrun, compute_next_prevmatch,
Input_from_file, the UTF-8 decode arrays) is now checked; a failure
returns a PatternError/-1 through the ordinary error path instead of
crashing on a NULL dereference, which several of them did before this
was audited (found by deliberately reasoning through "what happens when
this specific malloc fails on a huge request", not by a tool). This does
not prevent an out-of-memory condition on a genuinely memory-constrained
machine; the operating system's OOM killer can still end the process for
an allocation this library made in good faith (malloc/mmap returning
NULL/MAP_FAILED is the case this library can catch; being killed by
the kernel before that happens is not something a userspace library can
intercept). Measured concretely on the machine this was developed on: a
200MB file search that previously crashed via the OOM killer now completes
successfully in about 6 seconds at roughly 1.7GB peak RSS; a 1GB file on
the same machine still exceeded what was available at the time. Both
numbers are specific to that machine's available memory at the time, not
a hard property of the library; the 8.4x multiplier above is what actually
determines the practical ceiling on a given machine (roughly
available memory / 8.4 for search-family operations on a pattern using
OP_REPEAT1, more forgiving for match/fullmatch or for patterns
without a simple-atom quantifier at all).
Pattern syntax supported
Literals; . (with DOTALL); character classes with ranges, negation, and
\d \D \w \W \s \S; \b \B; anchors ^ $ \A \Z (with MULTILINE);
quantifiers * + ? {m,n} {m,} {,n} {m}, greedy and lazy; possessive
quantifiers *+ ++ ?+ {m,n}+; groups (...) (?:...) (?P<name>...);
alternation |; backreferences \1-\99, (?P=name), \g<name>,
\g<N>; lookahead (?=...) (?!...); fixed-width lookbehind
(?<=...) (?<!...); atomic groups (?>...); comments (?#...); global
inline flags (?aiLmsux) at the start of a pattern; escapes
\n \r \t \f \v \a, octal \0-prefixed escapes, \xhh, \uxxxx,
\Uxxxxxxxx; flags IGNORECASE, MULTILINE, DOTALL, VERBOSE, ASCII
(all with observable effect; see docs/API.md Section 2 for exactly what
each one does), plus UNICODE, LOCALE, and DEBUG (accepted for source
compatibility with Python, currently no-ops in this build: LOCALE because
this build commits to the "C" locale only, under which \w/\b/\B
classify only ASCII letters and digits regardless of the flag, verified
directly against both the C standard and a real CPython interpreter).
Rejected at compile time with a clear PatternError, rather than
mis-parsed: conditional groups (?(id)yes|no), scoped inline flags
(?flags:...), \N{NAME} named code points, and POSIX bracket classes
[:alpha:] (which are not part of Python re at all, concept.md 14.3).
Variable-width lookbehind is also rejected at compile time, matching
CPython.
Operations supported
Pattern_match/fullmatch/search/finditer/findall/split/sub/subn/free,
Pattern_groupindex_lookup,
Match_group/start/end/span/start_byte/end_byte/span_byte/free,
re_compile/match/fullmatch/search/finditer/findall/split/sub/subn/escape/purge,
PatternError_free. See regexx.h for exact signatures, docs/API.md for
the full reference (return values, memory ownership, exact Python
correspondence for each one), and concept.md Section 9 for the naming
convention they follow.
Known deviations from concept.md and from CPython, beyond the items above
\w,\s,IGNORECASEcase folding, and\dinUTF8mode are backed by glibc'swctype.hfunctions under theC.utf8locale, not by a hand-generated Unicode table (concept.md13.3 anticipated a reduced static table; using the C library's own tables turned out to be simpler and more complete, at the cost of depending on the platform's Unicode version rather than a pinned one). Concretely verified, not just theoretical: U+00A0 (NO-BREAK SPACE) is in Unicode'sWhite_Spaceproperty, so CPython's\smatches it, but glibc'siswspace()underC.utf8does not, so this build's\sdoes not either. Found by the large combinatorial test expansion (tests/cases.pyCategory F,tests/TEST_PLAN.md), not anticipated in advance; recorded here rather than patched, since hand-patching individual code points would start down the path of maintaining an ad hoc table this design deliberately avoided by delegating towctype.hin the first place. A second, same-class instance was found by the later Category I expansion: fullwidth digits (U+FF10-U+FF19, Unicode categoryNd) match CPython's\dbut not glibc'siswdigit()underC.utf8either.lastindex/lastgroupreport the highest-numbered capturing group that participated in the match, which coincides with CPython's "most recently closed group" rule for straightforward patterns but can differ from it in pathological cases (nested alternation re-executing a lower-numbered group after a higher one). Not exercised by the test suite; documented here rather than silently accepted.Match_free,PatternError_free,Input_from_buffer,Input_from_file, andInput_freehave no Python counterpart and are not mentioned inconcept.md's API surface; they exist because C has no garbage collector.Pattern_sub/Pattern_subntake the replacement template and the callback as two separate parameters rather than one polymorphic argument, for the same reason (concept.md9.4 already anticipates and justifies this one).- Python's
Match.start(group)/.end(group)raiseIndexErrorfor an invalid group number and return-1only for a valid group that did not participate;Match_start/Match_endreturn-1for both cases, since C has no exception to raise.Match_groupdoes distinguish them (-1for no such group,0for an unparticipated one), seedocs/API.mdSection 3.23. Pattern.groupindexhas no enumeration function in this build, onlyPattern_groupindex_lookup(pattern, name); there is no way to list every name a compiled pattern defines without already knowing what to look for.
Building
Requires a C11 compiler and, for the test suite, Python 3 (used only to
generate ground truth from CPython's own re module, concept.md Section
11; the library itself has no runtime dependency beyond the C standard
library and libc's wctype.h/locale.h).
make # builds libregexx.a and the rxgrep example
make test # regenerates tests/generated_tests.c from Python `re`
# ground truth and runs the full suite
make check # same, under AddressSanitizer + UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer
make clean
make install installs libregexx.a and regexx.h under PREFIX
(default /usr/local).
Using the library
#include "regexx.h"
#include <string.h>
const char *pattern = "(\\w+)@(\\w+)";
Pattern *pat = re_compile(pattern, strlen(pattern), UTF8, NULL);
Input *in = Input_from_buffer((const uint8_t *)"user@host", strlen("user@host"));
Match m;
if (Pattern_search(pat, in, 0, -1, &m) == 1) {
const char *g; size_t glen;
Match_group(&m, NULL, 1, &g, &glen); /* g/glen -> "user" */
Match_free(&m);
}
char *out; size_t outlen;
Pattern_sub(pat, in, "\\2@\\1", NULL, NULL, 0, &out, &outlen); /* "host@user" */
free(out);
Pattern_free(pat);
Input_free(in);
flags to re_compile combine a data mode, exactly one of BINARY,
ASCII, or UTF8 (concept.md 9.3), with any of the Python-named flags
(IGNORECASE, MULTILINE, DOTALL, VERBOSE, ASCII as a flag also
forces ASCII-only \w/\s/\d inside UTF8 mode, LOCALE, DEBUG).
Example: rxgrep
examples/rxgrep.c is a small grep-like program built on the library,
demonstrating all three data modes and both the matching and substitution
API:
./rxgrep -in 'hello' file.txt # case-insensitive, line numbers
./rxgrep -m utf8 -o '\w+' file.txt # print every UTF-8 word, one per line
./rxgrep -c 'error' log.txt # count matching lines
./rxgrep -m binary 'a.c' data.bin # match raw bytes, embedded NUL included
./rxgrep -m utf8 --sub 'REDACTED' '\d{3}-\d{4}' file.txt
Run ./rxgrep --help for the full option list.
examples/ has six further programs, each isolating one distinct feature
(a data mode, the undocumented CPython empty-match rule, atomic-group ReDoS
mitigation, mmap-backed large file input) rather than being a general
purpose tool; make examples builds all of them, and
examples/README.md lists what each one demonstrates.
Benchmarks
examples/bench_vs_posix.c measures this library directly against the C
standard library's own <regex.h> (POSIX regcomp/regexec, glibc's
DFA-backed implementation), on six scenarios at multi-megabyte or
multi-hundred-thousand-line scale, using only ERE pattern syntax that
regexx also accepts (no \d/\w/\s, no POSIX bracket classes), so both
engines run the identical pattern text against the identical subject.
Every scenario here uses a pattern with no backreference, lookaround, or
atomic group, so every one of them runs on the Pike VM ("The Pike VM"
above), not the backtracking engine.
Reported without adjustment in either direction, on this machine: glibc's
engine is roughly 8x to 70x faster on the three ordinary scenarios
(a literal search, extracting every number from a text, a*b), a real,
expected regression from where this build measured previously on those
same three scenarios (then roughly 2x to 25x, running on the backtracking
engine plus its own precomputed skip-ahead tables, before the Pike VM
existed at all): the Pike VM has none of that engine's constant-factor
optimizations yet (no literal prefilter, no lazy DFA state caching, no
allocation pooling, concept.md 7.7's explicitly deferred performance
axis; correctness came first, per the instruction this engine was built
under), and glibc's decades of exactly that kind of optimization show up
directly in the gap widening rather than narrowing. The fourth scenario
inverts entirely: the textbook ReDoS shape (a+)+b now runs faster than
glibc, with no atomic group needed at all, because a Thompson-NFA
simulation has no notion of "try one split, then backtrack and try
another" for the classic nested-quantifier ambiguity to exploit in the
first place; examples/redos_atomic.c's Part 2 shows the one case this
specific fix does not reach (a pattern with a backreference forces the
older, backtracking engine regardless of shape), where an atomic group
remains the pattern author's own necessary tool, not automatic. Every
scenario's match count is cross-checked between the two engines and
reported as agreeing or differing, an independent correctness check beyond
the CPython-derived test suite below.
Testing
tests/cases.py lists pattern/subject/operation triples, both hand-written
and, for most of the file, generated programmatically from combinations of
quantifiers, groups, backreferences, lookaround, flags, and encoding modes
(tests/TEST_PLAN.md records the exact category breakdown and why each one
exists). tests/gen.py computes every case's expected result with
CPython's own re module and writes tests/generated_tests.c, which is
then compiled against regexx.c and checked. This is a direct
implementation of the strategy concept.md Section 11 describes:
conformance is measured against what CPython actually does, not against a
re-derived reading of its documentation, at a scale (3,252 cases as of this
writing, make test reports the current exact count) large enough that it
has already found real defects this way, not only confirmed the absence of
ones anyone thought to write by hand (tests/TEST_PLAN.md "Result" names
all four: a C trigraph bug in the test generator itself, a real, previously
undocumented Pattern_finditer/Pattern_split empty-match defect, a wrong
ground truth for ASCII mode in the generator itself, and a real,
verified-wrong implementation of the LOCALE flag). make check
additionally runs the suite under AddressSanitizer and
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.