4aad7d6f649db54a3b9441b3a98e2b0f1fcaf245
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  retoorandClaude Sonnet 5
|
4aad7d6f64 |
Fix real memory leak Gitea CI caught, that local testing had been masking
CI / build-and-test (push) Failing after 38s
Gitea CI flagged two things on the last push: 1. A -Wunused-result warning on an intentionally-ignored write() return value in test_crash_consistency.c's progress side-channel. Fixed with an explicit (void) cast and a comment explaining why ignoring it is safe (a short write there only makes the progress count more conservative, per that function's own existing documented tolerance). 2. A real LeakSanitizer failure -- 256 bytes across 4 allocations from vfs_new/vfs_unmount. Root cause: tests/test_journal_failure.c's two "reopen after the failure, verify recovery" blocks called vfs_unmount/backend_free/backend_free inside their `if (ov2)` branch (the normal, expected path) but vfs_free(v2) only on the `else` branch, which is never actually reached in practice. Fixed by moving vfs_free(v2) to run unconditionally after the if, in both blocks. This bug was invisible locally across many runs because local sanitizer verification had been using ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 -- adopted originally for a real reason (a SIGKILLed forked child in test_crash_consistency.c never runs its own exit-time leak check, so its allocations were never the actual concern) but applied to the whole test run, which also suppressed detection of this real bug in the *parent* process's own code. CI doesn't set that option, so it caught what local runs couldn't. Documented in CONTRIBUTING.md as a real process gap, not just a code bug: a local verification habit that diverges from what CI actually runs can let a real finding through until it reaches CI. Verified: confirmed the leak directly first (reproduced locally by dropping the detect_leaks=0 override, matching CI exactly, before touching any code), then confirmed the fix by re-running the same no-override sweep across all 8 test binaries with zero leaks found, plus a clean make all + make test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UqJpkdJ6Njnt1pw3CbghzB |
||
|
retoorandClaude Sonnet 5
|
e41bd2334a |
Add real fault-injection crash-safety testing; investigate TSan for real
CI / build-and-test (push) Failing after 38s
Prompted by a direct question about data-integrity trustworthiness: the crash-safety design (self-checking journal records, atomic-rename compaction, Section 4.3/4.4) had never actually been tested against a real crash -- only reasoned about statically and tested against an already-corrupted file (test_pack_overlay.c, a different scenario). Added tests/test_crash_consistency.c: real fork()+SIGKILL fault injection against an actual child process, not a hand-truncated file standing in for a crash, with empirically-calibrated kill-delay sampling (measured via throwaway scripts, not guessed) so trials land genuine mid-operation interruptions rather than always completing first: - Journal-write crash injection (25 trials): kills a child mid-burst of individually-journaled, individually-fsynced writes; verifies a strict clean-prefix recovery (every completed write present and correct, every write after the kill cleanly absent, no gaps). 20-22/25 trials per run land a genuine interruption; zero corruption found. - Compaction crash injection (40 trials): kills a child mid-vfs_sync; verifies every write durably journaled *before* vfs_sync was called survives regardless of whether compaction itself completed. 40/40 trials per run land a genuine interruption; zero corruption found. A real finding from building this test, not from the code under test: the first draft reported 128 failures, every one a bug in the test itself -- it couldn't distinguish "the child was killed before ever attempting this write" from "the write completed and was then lost," since SIGKILL can't be caught to report progress. Fixed with an independent progress side-channel (plain write()+fsync() on a separate file, entirely outside packfs) as ground truth. Documented in CLAUDE.md's new "Known reliability characteristics" section, including this finding, because a claim is only as trustworthy as what's measuring it. Also investigated whether this sandbox's TSan block is actually unfixable, rather than re-asserting the known limitation: tried personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) directly (EPERM), setarch -R (fails identically), searched TSAN_OPTIONS for a bypass (none exists), and checked capabilities/seccomp/unshare --user (zero effective caps, active seccomp filter, namespace escape also blocked). Confirmed categorical and documented as such in CLAUDE.md/CONTRIBUTING.md, rather than left as an unexamined "it doesn't work here." Also closed a real documentation gap SECURITY.md had: the pack integrity checksum's non-cryptographic nature (FNV-1a64, already documented in the context of the compaction-dedup bug) had never been explicitly connected to its *other* use, load-time pack integrity validation -- added, since it's a real, relevant caveat for anyone relying on that checksum against a deliberate adversary rather than accidental corruption. Verified: clean make all + make test (all 7 binaries), full ASan/UBSan sweep of all 7 binaries with zero real findings, and the new test run standalone 4+ times (this session) with stable, consistent results. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UqJpkdJ6Njnt1pw3CbghzB |