Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
retoorandClaude Sonnet 5 21bcb4640f Move CI to Gitea Actions; this project is hosted on Gitea, not GitHub
CI / build-and-test (push) Failing after 23s
Per explicit direction: this repository is not going on GitHub. Moved
.github/workflows/ci.yml to .gitea/workflows/ci.yml (Gitea Actions'
convention) and updated every doc that referenced the old path or assumed
GitHub-specific features:

- .gitea/workflows/ci.yml: added a header comment on the two things that
  are genuinely Gitea-specific and instance-dependent, not just a renamed
  file -- `runs-on: ubuntu-latest` must match a label the actual
  registered Gitea runner advertises (there is no GitHub-hosted-runner
  equivalent, this is self-hosted), and `actions/checkout@v4` resolves
  against whatever action source that runner is configured with.
- CONTRIBUTING.md: corrected a claim that no longer holds -- it previously
  said CI "runs on a normal, unrestricted GitHub Actions VM where TSan is
  expected to work"; since this is actually a self-hosted Gitea runner
  whose environment isn't controlled by this repo, that assumption isn't
  something this repo can vouch for, so the text now says so rather than
  carrying the old (GitHub-shaped) assumption forward silently.
- SECURITY.md: removed a claim this project can't back up (that "private
  security advisories" are available once hosted -- that's a GitHub
  feature this repo never had access to); reporting is by direct email to
  the maintainer only.
- README.md: fixed a real gap while in here -- the "Security" section
  never actually linked to SECURITY.md despite it existing since the
  previous commit.
- CLAUDE.md, CHANGELOG.md: updated path references; CLAUDE.md's
  self-evaluation section (a historical record of an audit finding) keeps
  the old .github path where it describes what was literally true at that
  time, with a note explaining the rename, rather than rewriting history.

Verified: clean make all + make test, all 6 binaries pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UqJpkdJ6Njnt1pw3CbghzB
2026-09-14 11:03:20 +00:00
retoorandClaude Sonnet 5 419182bb05 Add version API, pkg-config, SPDX headers, SECURITY.md, CHANGELOG.md
Project-hygiene pass toward being a properly citable, embeddable,
professionally-packaged C library rather than just working code:

- PACKFS_VERSION_MAJOR/MINOR/PATCH/STRING in include/packfs.h, the single
  source of truth for the project's version, plus a runtime pfs_version()
  (src/vfs.c, next to vfs_new/vfs_free) so a dynamically-linked consumer
  can check ABI/API compatibility without recompiling. Covered by a new
  assertion in tests/test_mem.c that the macro and the runtime function
  never disagree.
- packfs.pc.in + a `make install` rule that generates packfs.pc with its
  Version: field derived from PACKFS_VERSION_STRING via a Makefile-level
  grep/sed, never hand-maintained separately -- verified end-to-end with a
  scratch `make install PREFIX=...` + `pkg-config --cflags --libs packfs`
  + `make uninstall`, not just by reading the rule.
- SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT added to every src/*.c and src/internal.h
  (include/packfs.h already had one); the whole distributed source tree
  now carries consistent machine-readable license metadata.
- SECURITY.md, stating precisely what this project's containment and pack-
  integrity code actually claims as a security boundary (concept.md
  Section 6/7) versus what it explicitly does not (unenforced `mode`, no
  cross-process concurrency) -- not generic boilerplate -- with a real
  reporting contact rather than a placeholder.
- CHANGELOG.md (Keep a Changelog format), summarizing the real history in
  git log to date; explicitly notes no version is tagged yet.

Verified: clean `make all` + `make test` (all 6 binaries, including the
new version-check assertion), and a full ASan/UBSan sweep of all 6
binaries with zero real findings (one run hit the already-documented
DEADLYSIGNAL sandbox flake on test_pack_write_perf across all 3 retries;
re-verified directly afterward with 5/5 additional clean passes and timing
well under any plausible timeout, confirming it was the flake, not a
regression, before treating this as done).

Deliberately not done here, by the user's explicit choice: no
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, and no git remote/publishing -- this repository still
has neither, and both are decisions left to the maintainer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UqJpkdJ6Njnt1pw3CbghzB
2026-09-14 10:58:35 +00:00