chore: update export statistics with new user count and contribution data

- Bump active users from 150 to 151 and total contributions from 4930 to 5039
- Update average contributions per user from 32.87 to 33.37
- Refresh cafecortado stats: contributions 36→37, post length 66→65, total length 2382→2409
- Append new posts to 12bitfloat and AceDev export files
- Regenerate all binary export artifacts (whl, tar.gz, png graphs, db)

export/posts-Liebranca.txt

@@ -114,4 +114,16 @@ You know, the thing about anything political is it relates directly to multitude
 
 Anyway, only for that thicc ass bamya they grow in mainland China I'm willing to say long live the communist party, all jokes obviously. Or is it? Would Chiang Kai-shek provide the Peronist Republic with produce of *this* quality? So many questions left unanswered.,@Demolishun boost is the answer to every other issue c: I just hate downloading libs all the time.,@cuddlyogre Back in the day, I thought no one would ever be nostalgic for the 2000s, and I've already been proven wrong. Give it another decade or two. Born-in-the-wrong-generation type kids will most likely find a way to look back at it positively, I'm sure.,@Chewbanacas Eclipse.,@Chewbanacas I don't use IDEs at all nowadays, thank God. This was a while ago. I had to edit someone else's work and couldn't build it from the commandline for some reason, so I bit the bullet. 99% of the workload was setting up the stupid environment, downright idiotic, but then the actual programming part was easy.
 
-By which I mean java, itself, is mostly OK. I think more or less the same of Kotlin if I'm being honest. The real problem is always the damn tooling, bullshit all the way down.,@retoor I'm fond of emacs but can't sacrifice my left pinky. I need it for guitar reasons. So I use nano and that mountain of build tools I wrote in perl, 100% console rat. I'm now rewritting the tools in fasm because I can: death to scripts is the new motto.```
+By which I mean java, itself, is mostly OK. I think more or less the same of Kotlin if I'm being honest. The real problem is always the damn tooling, bullshit all the way down.,@retoor I'm fond of emacs but can't sacrifice my left pinky. I need it for guitar reasons. So I use nano and that mountain of build tools I wrote in perl, 100% console rat. I'm now rewritting the tools in fasm because I can: death to scripts is the new motto.,lmao, I like coding like it's 1970. This modern bullshit needs to be erradicated, without mercy, shoved back up the very depths of that vast, ominous somber asshole that spawned it. Uncle Bob.
+
+Also Walruses.,@retoor My position on Walrus is that having a specific operator for "assign and return the assigned value" is utter nonsense.
+
+In "(X=*F) == Y", the result of the assignment is being checked for equality. It is obvious. Walrus is never obvious. For one, because it does something different in every language. If we don't agree on what the operator means, first and foremost, then it's a bad idea to begin with.
+
+Second, the reason multiple operators for assignment would even be desirable is making it explicit whether data is being copied rather than transfered. That is a real problem with every OOP reference dungfest, which Python is and so shares in this and every other design flaw. You get Walrus, but this, never properly addressed.
+
+Third, Walrus van Rossum, word ptr [$ECDE ror 16]; purposefully nonsensical yet absolutely meaningful in it's own way.
+
+What was I talking about again?,And then you die and there's nothing. Feel nihilistic yet?
+
+Just kidding; الله أكبر.,Also they're cute, makes it so their scientifically proven acts of straight-up mind control through parasites seem like less of an affront.```