Fix container sync failure caused by missing project file reference #67

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-07-13 00:29:56 +02:00 by retoor · 10 comments
retoor commented 2026-07-13 00:29:56 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

Summary

Every ~5 seconds, the container reconciliation service fails across all 12 running containers with an Errno 2 error when trying to copy a project file that no longer exists at the referenced path.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Observe the container service logs for any of the 12 running containers.
  2. Wait approximately 5 seconds.
  3. Note the repeated error referencing the missing file /home/retoor/projects/devplacepy/data/uploads/project_files/6a/98/019f46f5-d8df-7132-8c1a-a42b4601986a.jpg.

Expected Behaviour

The container sync should complete successfully, copying only existing files into each container's filesystem.

Actual Behaviour

The sync operation fails for every container because it attempts to copy a file that does not exist at the given path. The error aborts the entire sync for that container, preventing legitimate file updates from being applied.

Environment

  • Service: Container reconciliation service
  • Affected containers: All 12 running containers
  • Error first observed: ~16:00 on 2026-07-12
  • Error frequency: Every ~5 seconds per container (~144 errors/minute total)
  • File path: /home/retoor/projects/devplacepy/data/uploads/project_files/6a/98/019f46f5-d8df-7132-8c1a-a42b4601986a.jpg

Reported by retoor via DevPlace.

## Summary Every ~5 seconds, the container reconciliation service fails across all 12 running containers with an `Errno 2` error when trying to copy a project file that no longer exists at the referenced path. ## Steps to Reproduce 1. Observe the container service logs for any of the 12 running containers. 2. Wait approximately 5 seconds. 3. Note the repeated error referencing the missing file `/home/retoor/projects/devplacepy/data/uploads/project_files/6a/98/019f46f5-d8df-7132-8c1a-a42b4601986a.jpg`. ## Expected Behaviour The container sync should complete successfully, copying only existing files into each container's filesystem. ## Actual Behaviour The sync operation fails for every container because it attempts to copy a file that does not exist at the given path. The error aborts the entire sync for that container, preventing legitimate file updates from being applied. ## Environment - Service: Container reconciliation service - Affected containers: All 12 running containers - Error first observed: ~16:00 on 2026-07-12 - Error frequency: Every ~5 seconds per container (~144 errors/minute total) - File path: `/home/retoor/projects/devplacepy/data/uploads/project_files/6a/98/019f46f5-d8df-7132-8c1a-a42b4601986a.jpg` --- *Reported by **retoor** via DevPlace.*
plan-ticket-67.md
3.2 KiB
typosaurus commented 2026-07-20 00:14:08 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

I am picking this ticket up now.

First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.

I am picking this ticket up now. First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-20 00:14:38 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

Starting research round 1 of at most 5.

I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.

Starting research round 1 of at most 5. I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-20 00:19:44 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

Ticket 1024 describes a FileNotFoundError aborting the container sync. I compared the ticket against the current source and tests; commit 6fc0114 already catches that specific error and logs a warning, allowing the sync to complete normally. The reported failure pattern no longer exists in the codebase.

Based on this mismatch, could you confirm whether the ticket still represents an active issue, or should it be closed as resolved?

Ticket 1024 describes a `FileNotFoundError` aborting the container sync. I compared the ticket against the current source and tests; commit `6fc0114` already catches that specific error and logs a warning, allowing the sync to complete normally. The reported failure pattern no longer exists in the codebase. Based on this mismatch, could you confirm whether the ticket still represents an active issue, or should it be closed as resolved?
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:15:50 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

I am picking this ticket up now.

First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.

I am picking this ticket up now. First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:16:35 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

I need input to continue.

What I tried: Retried this step 3 times.
What I found: Each attempt failed for internal reasons unrelated to this ticket. The details are in the operator's logs; this is not a judgment about the ticket.

The system needs operator attention before I can continue. Reply here once things are healthy and I will resume from where I left off.

I need input to continue. What I tried: Retried this step 3 times. What I found: Each attempt failed for internal reasons unrelated to this ticket. The details are in the operator's logs; this is not a judgment about the ticket. The system needs operator attention before I can continue. Reply here once things are healthy and I will resume from where I left off.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:49:44 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

I am picking this ticket up now.

First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.

I am picking this ticket up now. First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:50:00 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

Starting research round 1 of at most 5.

I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.

Starting research round 1 of at most 5. I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:51:31 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

After comparing the ticket against the current source and tests, we found that the codebase already handles the described missing file references in both _export_node() and export_to_dir() by downgrading the error to a logged warning, allowing sync to continue without failure. This means the reported bug appears to have been fixed in a prior change.

Given this mismatch between the ticket description and the current state of the code, it seems no further work is needed. Could you confirm whether this ticket still reflects an active issue, or should it be closed as already resolved?

After comparing the ticket against the current source and tests, we found that the codebase already handles the described missing file references in both `_export_node()` and `export_to_dir()` by downgrading the error to a logged warning, allowing sync to continue without failure. This means the reported bug appears to have been fixed in a prior change. Given this mismatch between the ticket description and the current state of the code, it seems no further work is needed. Could you confirm whether this ticket still reflects an active issue, or should it be closed as already resolved?
retoor commented 2026-07-23 01:52:49 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Oke, clos ten.

Posted by retoor via DevPlace.

Oke, clos ten. --- *Posted by **retoor** via DevPlace.*
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:53:02 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

This ticket has been cancelled and closed at your request. The decision was made after the initial research round, with no execution or implementation attempts. No further action is expected.

This ticket has been cancelled and closed at your request. The decision was made after the initial research round, with no execution or implementation attempts. No further action is expected.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: retoor/devplacepy#67
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?