Remove temporary migrate_bug_tables_to_issue_tables code after next deploy #21

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-06-14 07:04:08 +02:00 by retoor · 10 comments
retoor commented 2026-06-14 07:04:08 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

Summary

Delete the temporary migrate_bug_tables_to_issue_tables code after the next deployment.

Steps to Reproduce

Not provided.

Expected Behaviour

Not provided.

Actual Behaviour

Not provided.

Environment

Not provided.

Reported by retoor via DevPlace.

## Summary Delete the temporary `migrate_bug_tables_to_issue_tables` code after the next deployment. ## Steps to Reproduce Not provided. ## Expected Behaviour Not provided. ## Actual Behaviour Not provided. ## Environment Not provided. --- *Reported by **retoor** via DevPlace.*
plan-ticket-21.md
2.6 KiB
typosaurus commented 2026-07-19 23:51:11 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

I am picking this ticket up now.

First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.

I am picking this ticket up now. First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-19 23:51:24 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

Starting research round 1 of at most 5.

I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.

Starting research round 1 of at most 5. I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-19 23:54:01 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

I reviewed the ticket against the current source code and tests, and cross-checked outside documentation and general knowledge. The requested function migrate_bug_tables_to_issue_tables does not exist in the source—it only appears in an early design document. Since there is no code to remove, the ticket does not describe an actionable change in the current codebase and represents a mismatch with the original request.

Could you confirm whether this ticket still applies, or should it be closed?

I reviewed the ticket against the current source code and tests, and cross-checked outside documentation and general knowledge. The requested function `migrate_bug_tables_to_issue_tables` does not exist in the source—it only appears in an early design document. Since there is no code to remove, the ticket does not describe an actionable change in the current codebase and represents a mismatch with the original request. Could you confirm whether this ticket still applies, or should it be closed?
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:15:59 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

I am picking this ticket up now.

First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.

I am picking this ticket up now. First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:16:41 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

I need input to continue.

What I tried: Retried this step 3 times.
What I found: Each attempt failed for internal reasons unrelated to this ticket. The details are in the operator's logs; this is not a judgment about the ticket.

The system needs operator attention before I can continue. Reply here once things are healthy and I will resume from where I left off.

I need input to continue. What I tried: Retried this step 3 times. What I found: Each attempt failed for internal reasons unrelated to this ticket. The details are in the operator's logs; this is not a judgment about the ticket. The system needs operator attention before I can continue. Reply here once things are healthy and I will resume from where I left off.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:29:39 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

I am picking this ticket up now.

First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.

I am picking this ticket up now. First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:29:58 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

Starting research round 1 of at most 5.

I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.

Starting research round 1 of at most 5. I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:31:28 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

The ticket requests removal of a component that does not exist in the current source base. The only reference to the target name appears in a stale design document, not in any executable module. No clarification was provided to redirect the scope to a real change. As a result, the described task cannot be performed as stated.

Could you confirm whether this is still accurate, or should the ticket be closed?

The ticket requests removal of a component that does not exist in the current source base. The only reference to the target name appears in a stale design document, not in any executable module. No clarification was provided to redirect the scope to a real change. As a result, the described task cannot be performed as stated. Could you confirm whether this is still accurate, or should the ticket be closed?
retoor commented 2026-07-23 01:34:13 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

It`s already done, yo can close.

Posted by retoor via DevPlace.

It`s already done, yo can close. --- *Posted by **retoor** via DevPlace.*
typosaurus commented 2026-07-23 01:34:52 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

This ticket has been cancelled and closed at your request. No implementation attempts were made, and no further action is expected.

This ticket has been cancelled and closed at your request. No implementation attempts were made, and no further action is expected.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: retoor/devplacepy#21
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?