Add deep research history with ability to reopen and continue chats #10

Open
opened 2026-06-14 04:29:30 +02:00 by retoor · 8 comments
Owner

Summary

Users should be able to view their own deep research history, click on past items to reopen them, see the chat history associated with each item, and continue the conversation from where they left off.

Steps to Reproduce

Not provided.

Expected Behaviour

  • A user can see a list of their past deep research sessions.
  • Clicking a past session opens it and displays the full chat history.
  • The user can continue the chat from that point.

Actual Behaviour

Not provided.

Environment

Not provided.


Reported by retoor via DevPlace.

## Summary Users should be able to view their own deep research history, click on past items to reopen them, see the chat history associated with each item, and continue the conversation from where they left off. ## Steps to Reproduce Not provided. ## Expected Behaviour - A user can see a list of their past deep research sessions. - Clicking a past session opens it and displays the full chat history. - The user can continue the chat from that point. ## Actual Behaviour Not provided. ## Environment Not provided. --- *Reported by **retoor** via DevPlace.*
Collaborator

I am picking this ticket up now.

First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.

I am picking this ticket up now. First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.
Collaborator

Starting research round 1 of at most 5.

I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.

Starting research round 1 of at most 5. I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.
Collaborator

I reviewed this ticket against the current source and tests, and confirmed the requested behavior—viewing past sessions, reopening them with full chat history, and continuing—is already implemented and covered. No clarifying replies from the reporter suggest a different scope.

Since the ticket describes existing functionality, it does not represent a bug or missing feature. Could you confirm whether this description is still accurate, or should the ticket be closed?

I reviewed this ticket against the current source and tests, and confirmed the requested behavior—viewing past sessions, reopening them with full chat history, and continuing—is already implemented and covered. No clarifying replies from the reporter suggest a different scope. Since the ticket describes existing functionality, it does not represent a bug or missing feature. Could you confirm whether this description is still accurate, or should the ticket be closed?
Collaborator

I am picking this ticket up now.

First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.

I am picking this ticket up now. First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.
Collaborator

I need input to continue.

What I tried: Retried this step 3 times.
What I found: Each attempt failed for internal reasons unrelated to this ticket. The details are in the operator's logs; this is not a judgment about the ticket.

The system needs operator attention before I can continue. Reply here once things are healthy and I will resume from where I left off.

I need input to continue. What I tried: Retried this step 3 times. What I found: Each attempt failed for internal reasons unrelated to this ticket. The details are in the operator's logs; this is not a judgment about the ticket. The system needs operator attention before I can continue. Reply here once things are healthy and I will resume from where I left off.
Collaborator

I am picking this ticket up now.

First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.

I am picking this ticket up now. First I will bring up an isolated workspace with a fresh checkout and investigate whether the ticket matches the current state of the code before planning any change. I will announce every step here before I take it.
Collaborator

Starting research round 1 of at most 5.

I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.

Starting research round 1 of at most 5. I am now reading the relevant source, tests, and prior work in the live checkout to verify the ticket and gather the context needed for a concrete plan. This can take a while; I will post periodic progress updates until it completes.
Collaborator

After comparing the ticket against the current source and tests, and reviewing outside documentation, the requested feature — deep research history with ability to reopen and continue chats — is fully implemented across all layers. Server-side listing (HTML and API), session detail page, WebSocket chat with full history replay, database functions, and tests are all in place. The ticket describes exactly what the code already provides, and no clarifying follow-up conversation overrides the original request. Therefore, this ticket appears to be a duplicate of existing functionality and no development work is needed.

Could you confirm whether this is still accurate, or should the ticket be closed?

After comparing the ticket against the current source and tests, and reviewing outside documentation, the requested feature — deep research history with ability to reopen and continue chats — is fully implemented across all layers. Server-side listing (HTML and API), session detail page, WebSocket chat with full history replay, database functions, and tests are all in place. The ticket describes exactly what the code already provides, and no clarifying follow-up conversation overrides the original request. Therefore, this ticket appears to be a duplicate of existing functionality and no development work is needed. Could you confirm whether this is still accurate, or should the ticket be closed?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: retoor/devplacepy#10
No description provided.