Code Farm economy rebalance: market saturation, infrastructure/defense/cosmetics, mastery track, secondary leaderboards, admin eras, underdog bonus and weekly contracts

Every purchase/upgrade path (new and pre-existing) is now race-safe against concurrent requests via atomic conditional SQL updates.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-22 23:55:46 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Sonnet 5
parent 024edb5291
commit 34f76aad65
54 changed files with 3886 additions and 164 deletions
+12 -1
View File
@@ -283,6 +283,17 @@ Required patterns: every `page.goto(...)`/`page.wait_for_url(...)` MUST pass `wa
**Never run tests unless the user explicitly asks for it.** Not the full suite, not a single file. Validate with a clean import (`python -c "from devplacepy.main import app"`) and per-language manual checks instead.
## Rigorous correctness verification (money, state machines, concurrency)
The persisted test suite (`tests/unit`/`api`/`e2e`) is example-based: it proves the specific inputs someone wrote down behave correctly. It is structurally blind to three classes of bug - a formula wrong at an input nobody tried, an invariant violated only after a long sequence of actions, and a race that only two nearly-simultaneous requests trigger. **Any feature that touches a spendable resource (coins, credits, quotas), a bounded state machine (levels, tiers, counters with a floor/ceiling), or a read-then-write mutation reachable from more than one request path applies this procedure in addition to, not instead of, the normal persisted tests.** A simple CRUD toggle doesn't need it; an economy, inventory, ledger, or scoring feature does. This was built out fully for the Code Farm economy rebalance (see `devplacepy/services/game/CLAUDE.md`, "Every purchase/upgrade is atomic..." - the worked example, including every bug it actually caught) and is the standing procedure for anything shaped like it going forward.
Four escalating layers, run in order, as disposable Python scripts that call the real functions directly against a temp DB (`DEVPLACE_DATABASE_URL`/`DEVPLACE_DATA_DIR` pointed at a scratch file) - not pytest files, unless the user separately asks for persisted tests too:
1. **Property/invariant checks on every pure function, across the full input domain.** For each formula (a reward, a cost curve, a score, a discount), assert the mathematical property it must have - monotonicity, bounds, non-negativity, idempotency, additivity over a partition of its domain - by iterating the real range (hundreds to thousands of values), not a handful of hand-picked spot checks. A monotonicity bug at input 347 is invisible if only 0, 1, and 10 are tried.
2. **Stateful fuzzing.** Build N independent entities, fire a long randomized sequence of every mutating action across all of them against a live temp DB, and re-check invariants after every single action: balances never negative, counters that should only increase never decrease, levels/tiers never exceed their declared bounds. Catch the domain's expected exception type and continue - the goal is catching invariant violations and *unexpected* exceptions, not asserting every action succeeds. This proves safety (nothing bad happens) but not liveness (legitimate actions actually succeed) - a bug that wrongly blocks a valid action just raises a well-formed expected exception and sails through a pure fuzz test undetected. Layer 3 exists because of exactly this gap.
3. **Concurrency: prove races are closed, never infer it from luck.** Any read-then-write mutation reachable from more than one worker process (`uvicorn --workers N`) is a TOCTOU race until proven otherwise. Test with **real separate OS processes**, not threads in one process - `dataset` gives each thread its own pooled connection, and enough threads exhausts that pool and produces `database is locked` noise that is a test-harness artifact, not a finding about the application. Set up genuinely fresh, production-representative state before racing - **never pre-seed or zero a column that the real code path leaves unset/NULL.** This was the single most expensive mistake made building this procedure: a first race-safety pass "passed" only because its own setup script had artificially pre-zeroed columns that a real fresh row leaves as SQL `NULL` - silently hiding the exact bug the fix was supposed to prevent (`NULL = 0` evaluates to `NULL`, not true, in a SQL `WHERE` clause; any column not written in the row's original `INSERT` needs `COALESCE(column, 0)` in every later precondition and every arithmetic `SET`, not a bare comparison). Fire many concurrent attempts at the same resource, assert the exact right number succeed, and verify the final state matches the hand-computed expected total exactly (currency spent, levels advanced) - not just "the others were blocked." Fix a real race with a single atomic conditional SQL statement at the exact chokepoint (`UPDATE ... SET ... WHERE <precondition>`, checked via the driver's real `rowcount` - `dataset`'s wrapped `db.query()` does not expose it, use `db.executable.execute(sqlalchemy.text(...), params).rowcount` inside `with db:`), not a client-side lock or an optimistic-locking library this codebase doesn't otherwise use.
4. **Static analysis beyond `py_compile`.** A clean `python -m py_compile` and a clean `from devplacepy.main import app` only prove syntax and module-load order - neither catches a missing import inside a function body, which is a runtime `NameError` invisible until that exact line executes. Run `pyflakes`/`ruff check` on every touched file before calling a change done; it is nearly free and catches an entire class of bug that layers 1-3 can each individually miss if they don't happen to exercise the broken line.
## Feature workflow
Every feature in DevPlace is **one data source fanning out into several consumers**. DevPlace has no isolated change - internalize this before editing. A single handler in `routers/{area}.py` is simultaneously the **four faces of one route**:
@@ -300,7 +311,7 @@ A new public read almost always needs all four. The cardinal failure mode is cha
4. **View layer.** Extend `base.html`; page CSS in `{% block extra_head %}`, page JS in `{% block extra_js %}`. Reuse partials and template globals. JS is ES6 modules, one class per file, instantiated on `app`.
5. **Agent + docs layer (the most-forgotten step - do not skip).** `services/devii/actions/catalog.py` - add an `Action` tool if a user could ask Devii to do this (`requires_auth=False` for public reads). `docs_api.py` - every public/auth endpoint gets an `endpoint()` entry with params and a `sample_response`. `routers/docs/pages.py` `DOCS_PAGES` for prose pages. SEO (`seo.py`) - `base_seo_context` and any JSON-LD for a new public page; add to `routers/seo.py` sitemap if indexable.
6. **Document.** `README.md` (product-facing, routes/config/dependencies/user-visible features), the relevant nested `CLAUDE.md` (any new mechanic, helper, pitfall, or cross-layer wiring), this root `CLAUDE.md` only when a NEW architectural rule or workflow step is introduced (not per feature).
7. **Validate.** Confirm a clean import (`python -c "from devplacepy.main import app"`), check each touched language manually, grep for em-dash in touched files (neither the character nor its HTML entity - use a hyphen). **Never run the test suite unless the user explicitly asks.** Write new tests in the matching tier/path when asked, following the required patterns above.
7. **Validate.** Confirm a clean import (`python -c "from devplacepy.main import app"`), check each touched language manually, grep for em-dash in touched files (neither the character nor its HTML entity - use a hyphen), and run `pyflakes`/`ruff check` on every touched file. **If the feature touches a spendable resource, a bounded state machine, or a read-then-write mutation reachable from more than one request path, also run the four-layer procedure in "Rigorous correctness verification" above** - it is the default for that shape of feature, not an optional extra. **Never run the persisted test suite unless the user explicitly asks.** Write new tests in the matching tier/path when asked, following the required patterns above.
Failures at any implementation step block the workflow - never skip a failed step.