7

Bugs

  • No evident bugs in the provided code.

Optimizations

  • Use more descriptive parameter names in the init method of Comment for clarity.
  • Utilize lazy var for properties that are computationally expensive and are not needed immediately upon object instantiation.
  • Consider making Comment conform to Codable directly instead of adding an inner CodingData struct.

Good points

  • Well-structured and organized code with clear commenting, aiding readability.
  • Effective use of Swift features such as struct, extension, and computed properties.
  • Thoughtful use of encapsulation and data transformation through the CodingData structure.

Summary

The code is well-structured, leveraging Swift's language features deftly, like extensions, to maintain code clarity and manage complexity. Code comments provide a good explanation of each property’s purpose, aiding future maintenance. It’s ready for integration but could be optimized for clarity and performance.

Open source alternatives

  • SwiftyJSON: Although primarily focused on JSON parsing, SwiftyJSON could ease the decoding process.
  • Codable from the Swift Standard Library: Direct use of Codable can provide a cleaner approach without needing separate structs for coding/decoding purposes.