|
8
|
|
|
|
### Bugs
|
|
- No apparent bugs in the provided code.
|
|
|
|
### Optimizations
|
|
- Consider adding a more meaningful test name instead of `example` for clarity and better maintainability.
|
|
- Add a comment or improve the documentation for the purpose and expected outcome of the test case.
|
|
|
|
### Good points
|
|
- The use of `@testable` import allows for testing of internal components, which is effective for unit testing in Swift.
|
|
- Use of async/await pattern, which is modern and appropriate for dealing with asynchronous code.
|
|
|
|
### Summary
|
|
The provided code snippet is a simple and clean setup for an asynchronous unit test in Swift using the `@testable` import. While it doesn't contain much detail, it employs modern Swift testing practices. Improvements can be made in naming conventions and documentation for enhanced clarity.
|
|
|
|
### Open source alternatives
|
|
- Quick (https://github.com/Quick/Quick): A behavior-driven development framework for Swift.
|
|
- Nimble (https://github.com/Quick/Nimble): A matcher framework for Swift used in conjunction with Quick for a BDD approach. |