**7**
|
||
|
||
### Bugs
|
||
- No evident bugs in the provided code.
|
||
|
||
### Optimizations
|
||
- Use more descriptive parameter names in the `init` method of `Comment` for clarity.
|
||
- Utilize `lazy var` for properties that are computationally expensive and are not needed immediately upon object instantiation.
|
||
- Consider making `Comment` conform to `Codable` directly instead of adding an inner `CodingData` struct.
|
||
|
||
### Good points
|
||
- Well-structured and organized code with clear commenting, aiding readability.
|
||
- Effective use of Swift features such as `struct`, `extension`, and computed properties.
|
||
- Thoughtful use of encapsulation and data transformation through the `CodingData` structure.
|
||
|
||
### Summary
|
||
The code is well-structured, leveraging Swift's language features deftly, like extensions, to maintain code clarity and manage complexity. Code comments provide a good explanation of each property’s purpose, aiding future maintenance. It’s ready for integration but could be optimized for clarity and performance.
|
||
|
||
### Open source alternatives
|
||
- **SwiftyJSON**: Although primarily focused on JSON parsing, SwiftyJSON could ease the decoding process.
|
||
- **Codable** from the Swift Standard Library: Direct use of Codable can provide a cleaner approach without needing separate structs for coding/decoding purposes. |