|
8
|
|
|
|
## Bugs
|
|
- No explicit bugs identified in the provided configuration.
|
|
|
|
## Optimizations
|
|
- Consider specifying more precise version numbers for the platforms (e.g., using `~>` for flexibility).
|
|
- If the `KreeRequest` package is crucial, you might want to lock down the version or audit it for potential breaking changes.
|
|
- Ensure that all dependencies are kept up to date regularly for security and performance improvements.
|
|
|
|
## Good points
|
|
- Comprehensive platform support, covering a wide range of Apple operating systems.
|
|
- Use of `upToNextMajor` for dependencies makes it easier to manage potential breaking changes.
|
|
- Organized structure in defining products and targets, adhering to Swift Package Manager norms.
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
The Package.swift configuration for `SwiftDevRant` is well-structured, supporting a broad range of Apple platforms, and uses best practices in defining dependencies. The inclusion of tests through a test target is a positive indicator of maintaining code quality. The versioning of dependencies is handled adequately with room for improvement in more controlled versioning strategies.
|
|
|
|
## Open source alternatives
|
|
- Alamofire: A popular HTTP networking library written in Swift.
|
|
- Moya: A network abstraction layer over Alamofire.
|
|
- URLSession: The native networking library provided by Apple, which could be leveraged without additional dependencies. |