blindxfish/devplacepy
1
0
Fork 0
forked from retoor/devplacepy
Code Pull Requests Activity

feat: add canonical redirect, og_image, next_page_url, and sitemap caching across content routers

Browse Source 
Implement canonical_redirect helper in content.py to enforce slug-based 301 redirects for gist, news, post, and project detail pages. Add first_image_url helper to extract primary image from item or attachments for Open Graph meta tags. Inject next_page_url into feed, gists, news, and projects list page SEO contexts for pagination link rel. Extend seo.py with SITEMAP_URL_LIMIT, SITEMAP_TTL constants and _sitemap cache variable for future sitemap generation optimization. Update profile page to raise 404 via not_found instead of 302 redirect, and include og_image from avatar_url.
This commit is contained in:
retoor
2026-06-05 18:05:07 +00:00
parent 9a24a90ec5
commit f05b6a4faf
14 changed files with 326 additions and 23 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
devplacepy/services/news.py
+36 -2
View File
@@ -207,8 +207,42 @@ class NewsService(BaseService):
content = strip_html(article.get("content", "") or "")[:1500]
prompt = (
"Rate this article's relevance to software developers on a scale of 1-10. "
"Return only a single integer between 1 and 10, nothing else.\n\n"
"You are an expert content strategist and editor for DevPlace, a "
"server-rendered social network for software developers. Decide how "
"strongly a given article should be published, expressed as a single "
"grade.\n\n"
"Site context:\n"
"- Audience: software developers, hobbyists and professionals, "
"interested in software development, AI agents, open-source tools, "
"systems programming, and self-hosting.\n"
"- Mission: deliver deep technical insight, critical analysis, and "
"practical value; build authority and reader trust; avoid low-effort, "
"rehashed, or clickbait content.\n"
"- Tone: technical, practical, nuanced, skeptical of hype; no "
"sensationalism or unverified claims.\n\n"
"Evaluate the article against these weighted criteria and weigh them "
"internally:\n"
"1. Relevance & alignment to the developer niche and audience needs "
"(20%).\n"
"2. Quality & accuracy: depth, originality, factual correctness, "
"sourcing, technical correctness, clear writing (25%).\n"
"3. Engagement & readability: strong title/intro/flow, useful "
"examples, appropriate length (15%).\n"
"4. Originality & uniqueness: new perspective, data, or analysis; not "
"duplicated generic web content (15%).\n"
"5. SEO & discoverability: keyword opportunity without stuffing, "
"shareable (10%).\n"
"6. Ethics, legality & risk: no misinformation, plagiarism, or "
"brand-safety issues; controversial topics handled with nuance and "
"evidence (10%).\n"
"7. Strategic fit for the site (5%).\n\n"
"Convert your overall judgment to a single integer grade from 1 to "
"10:\n"
"- 9-10: excellent, publish as-is.\n"
"- 7-8: good, worth publishing.\n"
"- 5-6: marginal, weak fit or quality.\n"
"- 1-4: reject, low quality or off-topic.\n\n"
"Return ONLY a single integer from 1 to 10, nothing else.\n\n"
f"Title: {title}\n"
f"Description: {description}\n"
f"Content: {content}"