# SQLite Forum — second datetime-related thread

## Metadata

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Institute | Molodetz Institute — Research & Retrieval Division |
| Subject | agent-memory-recency-tracking |
| Document type | Source Citation Card |
| Tier | 2 |
| Source title | (SQLite Forum thread, title not individually captured) |
| Source URL | https://sqlite.org/forum/info/5203f28a039a028754fda31591bbfb3c9ca9a949277cb45d789a2f78aecbd52f?t=c |
| Source type | forum thread |
| Date researched | 2026-10-09 |
| Researched by | tai (agent), model: Claude Sonnet 5, on behalf of retoor |
| Research method | Search aggregator result listing (not independently opened or quoted) |
| Confidence | Not independently verified |
| Status | Active |

## Why it's here

Surfaced by the search "SQLite last_accessed column unix timestamp vs datetime performance indexing" as a second, distinct SQLite forum thread from the one used as the Tier 1 source (`sqlite-forum-timestamp-integer-vs-text.md`); not opened or quoted independently during this pass.

## Changelog

| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | Logged as consulted-but-not-analyzed. |