CaptainRant said @Demolishun I'm dealing with code that 15 devs before me wrote horribly, lazily and spaghettily. Then my product owner thinks it's ok to put a 2-day time limit on it and call me fucked up when I'm not fast enough in solving it. What the fuck am I, a machine?,@jestdotty It's a good idea to rewrite but they put serious time constraints on me.,@retoor That is insignificant.,@netikras Good try but not correct. Tip: popular application used at work.,@D-4got10-01 It has a consistent pattern to it, therefore not gibberish.,Alright, the answer is: Slack https://youtube.com/watch/... Your musical interpretation may vary, though I think I portrayed it to a degree.,@lungdart I see your point, but that isn't true. Serious people who took their education seriously instead of partying have a deep body of knowledge and application.,@Tounai Yes, they should get better. The sad truth is that the industry normalizes this lazy way of working and no longer puts great importance on delivering with high quality.,@D-4got10-01 Why not defend when the original reply warrants it? Anyway, no reason to get dark.,@lungdart I'm not from that realm.,@Liebranca Well said. It is important to truly teach and to deeply understand.,@D-4got10-01 Some may argue that argumentation is a value of life.,@Lensflare Thus my reference to "Your musical interpretation may vary". I could have added a musical sheet for more details, which would indeed accentuate all that you described.```