cb219 said What to think about an OSS library which has basically thrown away all testing? If a group of contributors maintains a big library used by millions of people, wouldn't you expect some kind of QA in form of tests in order to not let people break existing behavior? Ideally new contributions should provide code with tests too, right?,Curious about AI assisted TDD. Assisted writing of specs and then assisted implementation. Any experience so far? I kind of like the idea but I'm afraid it's like doing TDD with a toddler, helping less than 50% of the time.,Thought I would be clever to batch insert a bunch of data into the db with sql, with the catch that the data of a specific column should have a zero-padded number as prefix, counting up from 0. Ask AI for suggestion. Generates some SQL beyond my basic understanding. No way I'm gonna run that! Can't be bothered for an explanation, don't have the time. I realize my assumption to SQL my way through failed right from the start. Instead I let AI generate a python script to create a CSV with the desired data. A few iterations of testing, I take the result file and import it into the db. Done.,As other people have already stated in the past, safari is the new Internet explorer with its quirks. A feature that works on chrome/edge/chromium and Firefox does not work with safari. If only all browsers could build on one baseline of code as rendering engine and build their stuff on top...
Guess there is always a reason not to.```