SoldierOfCode said Well, probably for the names I assume.
{name: "dog", age: 7, weight: 26} is clearer/easier to work with than ("dog", 7, 26),@typosaurus What can you tell me about retoor?,@retoor From what I heard there's quite a LOT of "gay" sex in Russian Army. Source: Russian friends.,@Lensflare Okay but if you're gonna "Um acktshchzuallyie", it was neither an apple nor apple tree, but that doesn't matter, the humour is still humouring.
The joke is funny and therefore it works, don't be a fun ruiner 😉,@cafecortado xD xD xD
I need this on a shirt now xD
But I meant that I accidentally used it for 5 months (instead of 1), not accidentally used it.,@retoor My first linux was RHL(=Red Hat Linux, Not to be confused with RHEL),Done.
The installation was the fastest out of any distro I've ever installed :O,@retoor Yep, Red Hat distros are rpm based(rpm=Redhat Package Manager),@retoor xfce is a DE not a WM tho, but I assume you just meant xfce's default WM, so no, I chose KDE(and it's WM) as DE and WM,@retoor,And here's the Hebrew-style version:,@retoor Oooh, that's a nice one,@Lensflare Me, I do it, I always press CTRL+S like 5 times instinctively,@Lensflare Simple? If you use keyboard shortcuts of any kind you must've encountered situations where you press a key and for one reason or another the thing just doesn't happen(Weird angle, weak press, too fast, PC just happened to hickup on that moment, etc), so you press it again. Except with saving you don't get a visual/auditory confirmation that you did indeed save, so you press multiple times in case it didn't save.,I meean, skill doesn't really have much to do with fame.
Fame is mostly Charisma, skill helps ofc, but Charisma and knowing how "sell" your skill is the main part. Charisma + Skill = Godlike, tons of Charisma with little Skill works almost just as much, and tons of Skill with no Charisma just doesn't work.

(Talking specifically about YouTube, Social Media and stuff like that ofc),But yeeeee
My boy @Ranchonyx mentioned
A fucking genius <3,Huh, I should buy a thermos cup
I have a habit of getting distracted and forgetting my tea for a few hours,What died in the forest that retoor of all people shits on AI suddenly xD
As for the 1/0/yes/no, you can actually explain to it that it's responses are going to be piped into a program and the program expects certain inputs.
GPT tends to behave more and give more accurate responses if you actually explain to it what's going on and what are you trying to do, hope this helps! ^_^,Because they're old. The ways dates have been handled by programmers have changed so many times after learning from mistakes.
It's complicated to handle because time IS a complicated matter (e.g. https://gist.github.com/timvisee/...).
C# and Java don't have multiple types and ways that handle time. They have ONE way and a bunch of outdated and deprecated ones.,Plus, not having a way to handle timezones is NOT a strength... No idea why you'd give that as an example of a good date system.
I don't know Swift but it sounds hard to believe it's dates can't handle timezones, but if it's actually true, than it's a huge downside.
Congradulations, you now can't use the language to do any network stuff or logging stuff or database stuff or etc',From what I understood it's considerably more efficient, thus costing less and being easier to train(=needing much smaller dataset), was created with a fraction of the funds OpenAI has, made some new(?) learning algorythm that learns much faster and from less data than GPT.
Also it's fully open source, both the code, and the model/dataset.

Which, if all that is true that sounds like a pretty huge jump, so I'd understand why there is hype.
I didn't dig into it too much tho, all I said above is from hearsay(so don't trust me too much).,I wonder what you two will have to say about it: @retoor @jestdotty
I'd think to have interesting takes/opinions about it,@retoor Wow, I've never raid so much "nothing" slop before xD
But that's AIs for you I guess.
It literally wrote whole 4 paragraphs without avtually saying *anything*
Sounds like corpo speech, where someone's just trying to sound smart/sophisticated so they just use a LOT of a formal and smart sounding words lmao,@retoor Bruh he's literally married.,@retoor And the second description is still just a bunch of text with no points. It's trying to meta analyze me through post lengths instead of the actual post contents? I don't get why.
But yeah, a bunch of text and it still said nothing.,Human ingenuity isn't what gives human value.
Holy shit that would be such a horrible take,Wait why?,@electrineer The fuck?,@MammaNeedHummus Okay???..
Literally just had a weird and funny embarrassing moment and thought it'd be funny to share.
The hell is your problem lmao,@D-4got10-01 Meritocracy all the way!,@retoor You KNOW I'm conservative lmao, I'm literally fighting in a war, that's already pretty 'right' leaning, I believe in god, you know that lol

But it's not about that, Non-Woke doesn't mean conservative, "I don't want politics in my distro" is not a conservative take, there are a lot of liberals who share the same opinion. Just because wokies are *usually* leftist, doesn't mean leftists are woke or that they like them. I know a LOT of left-leaning people who absolutely despise wokeism, some of them are gay and left-leaning and dislike woke culture.,If you're already doing that, make devrant archives, in case the site goes down since it's not being maintained anymore,It's really simple actually, most people REALLY don't wanna think, they would really prefer someone else do the thinking for them. So when a system is suggested that does the thinking and decisions for you, most people would be on board. What does the system do? How does it do it? Why does it do it? People would REALLY prefer NOT to know and not to think about it. So the system does whatever it wants and follows whatever agenda it has.,Ummm

dnf/emerge/pacman/apt/flatpak(/etc') search [Software Name]

sudo dnf/emerge/pacman/apt/flatpak(/etc') install [Package Name]

95% of the times...,@BordedDev you mean this?,I've yet to see a person who tells other's they're not "selfless" enough, that was even remotely selfless. It's always the super manipulative ones,Which means there's literally no reason to take anything they say seriously or imto consideration,@jestdotty Are you saying every single person on earth says you're not selfless enough? Stop hallucinating and making up what people think about you.```