11 lines
1.8 KiB
JSON
11 lines
1.8 KiB
JSON
|
{
|
||
|
|
"extension": ".swift",
|
||
|
|
"source": "/// Represents the different kinds of votes that a rant or comment can have.\npublic enum VoteState: Int, Hashable, Sendable {\n /// A given ++ vote.\n case upvoted = 1\n \n /// No votes given.\n case unvoted = 0\n \n /// A given -- vote.\n case downvoted = -1\n \n /// Not able to vote (if the rant or comment belongs to the logged in user).\n case unvotable = -2\n}\n",
|
||
|
|
"review": "**8**\n\n### Bugs\n- None\n\n### Optimizations\n- None necessary; the code is already concise and efficient.\n\n### Good points\n- Use of `enum` with `Int` raw values simplifies direct comparisons and storage in certain types of collections.\n- Conformance to `Hashable` and `Sendable` is a good practice for future compatibility and concurrency.\n- Clear documentation comments describe each case, enhancing the understandability.\n- The use of negative, zero, and positive values is intuitive for this domain context (voting logic).\n\n### Summary\nThe code is well-structured, efficiently using Swift's `enum` to categorize vote states with associated integer values. The choice to adopt `Hashable` and `Sendable` suits modern Swift programming best practices, aiding in serialization and safe concurrency. There are no apparent bugs or necessary optimizations, and the documentation is clear and concise.\n\n### Open source alternatives\n- **Swift's `Result` Type**: Although more generic, it can be used for similar representations in voting systems.\n- **Custom Implementations in Projects like Mastodon or Lemmy**: Often, custom voting systems can be seen in open-source frameworks of social media platforms, providing rich functionalities.",
|
||
|
|
"filename": "VoteState.swift",
|
||
|
|
"path": "Sources/SwiftDevRant/Models/VoteState.swift",
|
||
|
|
"directory": "Models",
|
||
|
|
"grade": 8,
|
||
|
|
"size": 388,
|
||
|
|
"line_count": 15
|
||
|
|
}
|